General Harley Davidson Chat Forum to discuss general Harley Davidson issues, topics, and experiences.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

V&H ProPipe vs D&D FatCat Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 03-03-2012, 08:34 AM
jo_mama's Avatar
jo_mama
jo_mama is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Pennslytucky
Posts: 3,881
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ride my Seesaw
Was it tuned up, let's say on the D & D, then changed to the Pro-pipe without retweaking the tune? Or was the bike retuned each time the pipes were changed making for a level playing field?
give the dyno guy some credit. i doubt even a bad technician would do that.
 
  #12  
Old 03-03-2012, 02:07 PM
fella's Avatar
fella
fella is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wis
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ride my Seesaw
Was it tuned up, let's say on the D & D, then changed to the Pro-pipe without retweaking the tune? Or was the bike retuned each time the pipes were changed making for a level playing field?
The bike was retuned for the pipe.
Originally Posted by ackman1968
I like the sound of the Fat Cat and it looks way better than the Pro Pipe. One day my bike will have one, just have other places to dump the cash right now. Thanks for sharing the numbers though, just reinforces my desire to have one.
Welp...after looking at the dyno chart I feel MORE than vindicated in my decision to swap out the FC for the PP. I gave up 4 peak hp and 5 peak tq but gained 15ftlb & 8hp up to 3k where the FC always felt weak. I'm happy!
Name:  img001.jpg
Views: 2079
Size:  97.0 KB
 
  #13  
Old 03-03-2012, 04:04 PM
oct1949's Avatar
oct1949
oct1949 is offline
Club Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northeast of Indy..
Posts: 145,895
Received 817 Likes on 803 Posts
Default

Thats what I see when I enlarge the sheet.

I also see the Pro Pipe kicked the D&D in the 2- 3k rpm's, which is the rpms where a lot of us spend a lot of time.

Is that the newer PP chrome or the older style BP - PP??





k
 

Last edited by oct1949; 03-14-2012 at 08:39 PM.
  #14  
Old 03-03-2012, 05:48 PM
fella's Avatar
fella
fella is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wis
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oct1949
I also see the Pro Pipe kicked the D&D in the 2- 3k rpm's, which is where a lot of us speed75% of time riding.
Yeah pretty cool huh!

Originally Posted by oct1949
Is that the newer PP chrome or the older style BP - PP??
It's the newer one.
 
  #15  
Old 03-03-2012, 06:07 PM
ackman1968's Avatar
ackman1968
ackman1968 is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 3,863
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fella
The bike was retuned for the pipe.


Welp...after looking at the dyno chart I feel MORE than vindicated in my decision to swap out the FC for the PP. I gave up 4 peak hp and 5 peak tq but gained 15ftlb & 8hp up to 3k where the FC always felt weak. I'm happy!
Damn, it beats it up right in the heart of my riding range! Just what I needed, something else to think about.
 
  #16  
Old 03-03-2012, 06:22 PM
JohnC FXDX's Avatar
JohnC FXDX
JohnC FXDX is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West New york, NJ
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You'll notice that 15lbs. in the low end vs. That few at the peak. I actually had some guys on the Dtna forum the other day trying to justify a 2-2 over a 2-1. They were trying to say that you would never feel the power difference and the two bikes would be even in a race. This shows how different two different 2-1 pipes can be, and they are both better than a 2-2.
 
  #17  
Old 03-04-2012, 12:58 AM
fella's Avatar
fella
fella is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wis
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JohnC FXDX
You'll notice that 15lbs. in the low end vs. That few at the peak.
I always felt that my bike with the FatCat never really pulled in the low rpm's especially riding 2 up. Kind of a pita at stop lights in town. I think you're right about feeling the difference where the Propipe is stronger.
 
  #18  
Old 03-04-2012, 02:24 AM
bigdaddy33's Avatar
bigdaddy33
bigdaddy33 is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,082
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I guess I'm looking at the results a little differently. The point of doing performance mods is to see improvement when you twist the throttle to accelerate. Between 3-4.5K RPM's, the D&D is clearly the better performing pipe.
 
  #19  
Old 03-04-2012, 03:20 AM
RockerSE's Avatar
RockerSE
RockerSE is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Upstate South Carolina
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good thread, thanks for posting your results.
 
  #20  
Old 03-04-2012, 03:59 AM
mac0478's Avatar
mac0478
mac0478 is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Great thread. I am getting a Pro Pipe Chrome installed on my FLHR on Wednesday. I feel like my kids before Christmas!
 


Quick Reply: V&H ProPipe vs D&D FatCat Dyno Results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 PM.