School Board Settles Suit with Deaf Woman
I feel society has an obligation to ease the problems for disabled people but, as cold-hearted as it may sound, disabled people need to face the fact that their disability is going tolimit thethings they cando in their lives. I don't believe society has an obligation to accomodate them to the extent their disability is totally neutralized. I read an article several years ago where an advocate group for disabled Americans was demanding wheelchair-accessible trails to the bottom of the Grand Canyon. Totally absurd, in my opinion. I'm sorry, but if an individual has lost the use of their legs they just need to face the fact that hiking to the bottom of the Grand Canyon is something they're never going to accomplish.
Rant over.
I think there's been bit of a misunderstanding. I don't know how much of the class is funded by the state. In the past had said that the class was state funded, but now see that students have to pay $175 to take it. I imagine that since the class is funded by the state in the least bit (by providing the facility) that the Americans with Disabilities Act (not Civilians with Disabilities Act) applies.
Now, do I think that a deaf person riding a motorcycle is wrong? No, I don't. Like I said before, sure they can't hear sirens, but there's also lights to warn them of an emergency vehicle. Sure they can't hear horns, but that's last resort.
Now, do I think that this person should get a Sign Language Interpreter at the school's expense. No, I don't. Riding a motorcycle is a priveledge that if lost will not impact someone's life to the point where they can't sustain their life. It may suck for them, but I don't think we should apply the Americans with Disabilities Act to this particular situation. Like I said before I'm sure she can read lips. I'm also positive that any private school that charges $300-$400 for the MSF course would be more than happy to spend extra time with her to make sure she got access to the lecture the same as any other student.
Mike
Pete,
I think there's been bit of a misunderstanding. I don't know how much of the class is funded by the state. In the past had said that the class was state funded, but now see that students have to pay $175 to take it. I imagine that since the class is funded by the state in the least bit (by providing the facility) that the Americans with Disabilities Act (not Civilians with Disabilities Act) applies.
Now, do I think that a deaf person riding a motorcycle is wrong? No, I don't. Like I said before, sure they can't hear sirens, but there's also lights to warn them of an emergency vehicle. Sure they can't hear horns, but that's last resort.
Now, do I think that this person should get a Sign Language Interpreter at the school's expense. No, I don't. Riding a motorcycle is a priveledge that if lost will not impact someone's life to the point where they can't sustain their life. It may suck for them, but I don't think we should apply the Americans with Disabilities Act to this particular situation. Like I said before I'm sure she can read lips. I'm also positive that any private school that charges $300-$400 for the MSF course would be more than happy to spend extra time with her to make sure she got access to the lecture the same as any other student.
Mike
Well here goes.
My best friend in school was/is a deaf mute, my sisters husband, my brother in laws mother and father are bothdeaf mutes. I tell you this so you know where I'm coming from.
My best friend, Joe, "The deaf mute",was the Ohio state High School Gymnastic Champion for three years in a row, not only that but he carried a 3.5 GPA through out high school. Joe was offered a full ride to quite a few collages and university's around the country.
Joe took a scholarship to The Ohio State University where he excelled in gymnastics until an injury cut his participation short.
Life after gymnastics was different for my friend, it gave him more time to devote to his studies, Joe graduated with a 4.0 GPA, he went on to graduate school and finely received his Doctorate in Education.
Joe did all of this without the use or need of an interpretor. he relied on his own abilities to excel in sports, school and in life.
My friend was never a burden on the tax payer, Joe paid his own way. By the way, my friend and I both attended a public high school in Columbus, Ohio.
My brother in laws mother and father, they both teach at a school for the deaf and blind in Columbus. nether of them had an interpreter while attending school, and do not use them now. Yes they use closed captioning and other devices for their telephone, but everything else they provide for themselves.
I don't think the people on this forum are putting down anyone because of their disability, I think they are just saying that they don't feel they should pay for someones recreational pursuits. i.e. motorcycle riding.
If you feel tax payers should pay for an interpreter for the motorcycle exam/safety course then maybe you feel tax payers should also pay for an interpreter for sky diving lessons, how about SCCA roar racing, you see where this is going.
I'm very happy for your son, you should be very proud of him, I know I would be. But, theres always that but, I don't think it's my responsibility to help pay his way anymore then any other school kid.
If he needs an interpreter, thats on you, it should be your dime not mine that pays for that.
It's not the tax payers responsibility tolevel the playing field, it's yours.
[quote]ORIGINAL: Rodney1976
Anyone here know some one who is deaf? Let me explain a few things to you. I have a son who was born deaf. He is my pride and joy. He is more open to people then most here. He does not see black, yellow, orange or brown. He does not care if you can hear or not. He driveshis own, car a nice jeep. He worked played football for all his high school years.Lettered in it. He graduated an honer student. You know what? He had an interpreter for all of it. Right now he works at Papa Murphfys and goes to collage and is paying for all of it him self. He just got engaged to a very sweet girl and wewill be proud towelcome herintojoin our family. This girl is going to collage to be an interpreter for the deaf. In the Business and Law side of signing.
My wife taught him how to drive. You know what it is like trying to tell your kid to stop quickly? My daughter signs. My son In-law signs. My grand kids are learning to sign.
I can not believe what I have seen here. How little people can be. This form is getting filled with nothing but bashers. If your not with us your not cool. Will leave me out of your cool.
Just a fact. If state funds are used for schooling or instructions for your kids. The deaf and disabled have the same right to that course. Your kids or wife brother sister Mom or dad are no better then mine. Before you go to throwing rocks at the house you better see who is watching from inside.
A
[quote]ORIGINAL: Alias
You know Rodney I was not going to respond to this thread until I read you response.
Well here goes.
My best friend in school was/is a deaf mute, my sisters husband, my brother in laws mother and father are bothdeaf mutes. I tell you this so you know where I'm coming from.
My best friend, Joe, "The deaf mute",was the Ohio state High School Gymnastic Champion for three years in a row, not only that but he carried a 3.5 GPA through out high school. Joe was offered a full ride to quite a few collages and university's around the country.
Joe took a scholarship to The Ohio State University where he excelled in gymnastics until an injury cut his participation short.
Life after gymnastics was different for my friend, it gave him more time to devote to his studies, Joe graduated with a 4.0 GPA, he went on to graduate school and finely received his Doctorate in Education.
Joe did all of this without the use or need of an interpretor. he relied on his own abilities to excel in sports, school and in life.
My friend was never a burden on the tax payer, Joe paid his own way. By the way, my friend and I both attended a public high school in Columbus, Ohio.
My brother in laws mother and father, they both teach at a school for the deaf and blind in Columbus. nether of them had an interpreter while attending school, and do not use them now. Yes they use closed captioning and other devices for their telephone, but everything else they provide for themselves.
I don't think the people on this forum are putting down anyone because of their disability, I think they are just saying that they don't feel they should pay for someones recreational pursuits. i.e. motorcycle riding.
If you feel tax payers should pay for an interpreter for the motorcycle exam/safety course then maybe you feel tax payers should also pay for an interpreter for sky diving lessons, how about SCCA roar racing, you see where this is going.
I'm very happy for your son, you should be very proud of him, I know I would be. But, theres always that but, I don't think it's my responsibility to help pay his way anymore then any other school kid.
If he needs an interpreter, thats on you, it should be your dime not mine that pays for that.
It's not the tax payers responsibility tolevel the playing field, it's yours.
[quote]ORIGINAL: Rodney1976
Anyone here know some one who is deaf? Let me explain a few things to you. I have a son who was born deaf. He is my pride and joy. He is more open to people then most here. He does not see black, yellow, orange or brown. He does not care if you can hear or not. He driveshis own, car a nice jeep. He worked played football for all his high school years.Lettered in it. He graduated an honer student. You know what? He had an interpreter for all of it. Right now he works at Papa Murphfys and goes to collage and is paying for all of it him self. He just got engaged to a very sweet girl and wewill be proud towelcome herintojoin our family. This girl is going to collage to be an interpreter for the deaf. In the Business and Law side of signing.
My wife taught him how to drive. You know what it is like trying to tell your kid to stop quickly? My daughter signs. My son In-law signs. My grand kids are learning to sign.
I can not believe what I have seen here. How little people can be. This form is getting filled with nothing but bashers. If your not with us your not cool. Will leave me out of your cool.
Just a fact. If state funds are used for schooling or instructions for your kids. The deaf and disabled have the same right to that course. Your kids or wife brother sister Mom or dad are no better then mine. Before you go to throwing rocks at the house you better see who is watching from inside.
Andyes he is l
I read your last post and I agree with you 100%.
I don't think it's up to society to pay for every recreational activity you want to participate in just because you have a disability. Deaf children should (and usually do)get all the help they need to have the same oppurtunities as hearing children. That's what American society does, we take care of our own. At least, we'de like to think we do.
But here we're talking about a electiverecreational activity that is not required for any kind of advancement. It's just something she wants to do. Why does everybody else have to pay for what she wants to do? That class cost the school an additional $2340 to run. How many are in the class? 20? So lets spread the cost out amongst the rest of the class. Now the $175 class costs $290. If you were in that class, how would you feel about that? Check next year and see how much this class costs. I bet it's more than $175.
Additionally, you notice she was also awarded $7,500 for "emotional distress". Ahhhh, now we get to the root of the issue. A little extra cash is nice. I guess she won the Litigation Lottery.
Rodney, get off your high horse. Are you offended by the responses above? To darn bad. I'm offended by yours. The only corrolation in this case is that she is deaf. No other relationship to you, your family, or your situation. Just because she's deaf doesn't make her right.
If she's allowed to get a license, which she is, then she should be able to take the class. The Civilians with Disabilities act requires that if she is allowed to take the class, she should be provided with the means to do so.
Mike
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
I don't think it's up to society to pay for every recreational activity you want to participate in just because you have a disability. Deaf children should (and usually do)get all the help they need to have the same oppurtunities as hearing children. That's what American society does, we take care of our own. At least, we'de like to think we do.
But here we're talking about a electiverecreational activity that is not required for any kind of advancement. It's just something she wants to do. Why does everybody else have to pay for what she wants to do? That class cost the school an additional $2340 to run. How many are in the class? 20? So lets spread the cost out amongst the rest of the class. Now the $175 class costs $290. If you were in that class, how would you feel about that? Check next year and see how much this class costs. I bet it's more than $175.
Additionally, you notice she was also awarded $7,500 for "emotional distress". Ahhhh, now we get to the root of the issue. A little extra cash is nice. I guess she won the Litigation Lottery.
Rodney, get off your high horse. Are you offended by the responses above? To darn bad. I'm offended by yours. The only corrolation in this case is that she is deaf. No other relationship to you, your family, or your situation. Just because she's deaf doesn't make her right.
If anyone is on a high horse it might be you. I can gurantee you that if you had a deaf child or relative you might have a different view on this subject.






