When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
these just might be the exception so you might wrong...seems V&H went to great lengths to design the best muffler ever specifically for the M8s taking all aspects into consideration
when they were introduced Bryan from V&H came on here and was grilled pretty good about the large baffle and torque loss and I recall he upheld their position that the baffle design was the key...I was one of the ones to challenge this but agree, seems nobody would recommend that big of a baffle for most touring performance bikes..be interesting to hear pro feedback now that they have been out for quite awhile
Im definitely no exhaust expert but have been through enough sets with all different kinds of baffles and in my experience all the big open baffles suffers to some degree on the bottom. The Torquer is just a 2.75 inch louvered baffle so nothing ground breaking there. I would like to see some real world dyno graphs from users, not V+H.
did you ask them, and did they say..they have actually ran tests on these? we have V&H saying one thing, and Painted Pirate in real World use states he feels he regained lost torque from his rineharts after installing 450 torquers....if I were looking at OEM replacements I would stick with 4" muffs
these just might be the exception so you might wrong...seems V&H went to great lengths to design the best muffler ever specifically for the M8s taking all aspects into consideration
when they were introduced Bryan from V&H came on here and was grilled pretty good about the large baffle and torque loss and I recall he upheld their position that the baffle design was the key...I was one of the ones to challenge this but agree, seems nobody would recommend that big of a baffle for most touring performance bikes..be interesting to hear pro feedback now that they have been out for quite awhile
V&H can say what they want... and speak to their own internal design and marketing. Note that their own website does NOT even mention the size of their baffle being 2-3/4". One has to drag it out of them on the forums or call their C/S. The fact that NO dyno charts exist or made available concerns me... back up what you say with proof. I was surprised when V&H customer service advise me to call FuelMoto for possible Dyno sheets.. and I did and none exist - especially for my 2021 bike since no one has software that can speak to the new Harley ECM protocal as of yet - so even FuelMoto can't even sell a PowerVision tuner or dyno a 2021 bike yet!!!!
Not calling V&H liars... I am just going to put my faith in FuelMoto (who does not have a dog in the fight) to steer me straight on what I should do.
Last edited by Beachbumcook; May 10, 2021 at 01:10 PM.
did you ask them, and did they say..they have actually ran tests on these? we have V&H saying one thing, and Painted Pirate in real World use states he feels he regained lost torque from his rineharts after installing 450 torquers....if I were looking at OEM replacements I would stick with 4" muffs
4 or 4.5, I dont think the diameter makes a huge difference, its whats on the inside that seems to matter.
did you ask them, and did they say..they have actually ran tests on these? we have V&H saying one thing, and Painted Pirate in real World use states he feels he regained lost torque from his rineharts after installing 450 torquers....if I were looking at OEM replacements I would stick with 4" muffs
FuelMoto did not have dyno charts for the Torquer 450's... but just many years of experience working with muffler and baffle designs for every kind of set-up imaginable. They said with a stock head-pipe, just louder and minimal loss of low-end, but there would be some loss no matter if one feels it in the "seat of the pants" or not.
4 or 4.5, I dont think the diameter makes a huge difference, its whats on the inside that seems to matter.
yeah but how many manufacturers make 2.75" baffles in 4" mufflers? don't matter, I'm also in the same camp of less is more for Touring bike performance anyway
yeah but how many manufacturers make 2.75" baffles in 4" mufflers? don't matter, I'm also in the same camp of less is more for Touring bike performance anyway
Ive had 4 and 4.5s, I like them both but with the oem stretched bags I much more prefer the look of the 4.5 to fill out the hole. I think Im finally set on my keepers, LoL, Ive had my current setup longer than any other so I guess they have found their forever home maybe
All I have for my personal experience from running DBX and TQ450 is my butt dyno, I'm not too interested in the numbers game. My 114 had the HD Tuner, extreme ventilator and HD's Torque cam stage two when running both the Rineharts and V&H slipons. Immediately noticed a big dip in off the line, 2k-2.5k -ish RPM and throttle response diminished a bit with the DBX 4.5. Swapped out to the Torquer 450, did nothing else, the issues went away and the bike performs like it should, stump pulling power at any RPM and snappy throttle response. Again, that's my experience.
All I have for my personal experience from running DBX and TQ450 is my butt dyno, I'm not too interested in the numbers game. My 114 had the HD Tuner, extreme ventilator and HD's Torque cam stage two when running both the Rineharts and V&H slipons. Immediately noticed a big dip in off the line, 2k-2.5k -ish RPM and throttle response diminished a bit with the DBX 4.5. Swapped out to the Torquer 450, did nothing else, the issues went away and the bike performs like it should, stump pulling power at any RPM and snappy throttle response. Again, that's my experience.
When I said I would like to see some dyno charts its not about numbers, it about seeing the curve, lots of times poor performing exhaust will put out similar peak numbers to a good exhaust but when you see the curves that tells the whole story. Im glad you got your bike running like you want sir, in the end thats the only thing that matters!
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.