When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I can set my cruise at 100MPH layback with my head on the back seat and put my feet above the windscreen and ride for an hour (on straight roads). No matter how many tar snakes or bumps I can almost fall asleep. I guess I'm lucky, the shark just runs straight.
I've had several baggers and the only one that exhibited ( minimal at best ) wobble was my 1992 FLHTCU ... and it didn't start until after 50,000 miles ... The maiden voyage of my 2009 FLHTCU was down into the Smokies for a week ... "Red" was with me and was impressed by the ride but it was her comments after several days down there and us deciding to take "high speed shot" at the Cherohala Highway ... After twisting it up and into 4th gear she commented, and I quote "What a fu˘kin' difference" and ( generally ) she's not one to use expletives ... She's happy, I'm happy :>)
Strange. My entire bike is stock except for the tires and power-adders and I throw this thing around in the corners at high speed on a regular basis. She's planted. Anything less would scare the crap out of me.
Yep, and I believe most are. I am just lucky. It can be a bit scary, especially in a cross wind, when you are doing 100+
It is NOT my first experience with a death wobble. I had a GSXR 750 that went into bar-slap at 90 due to junk steering head bearings, and a CBR1000F that did it in a corner with junk tires. KNOCK ON WOOD, I rode them all out...not sure if it makes me more sensitive, or numb to it. My buddy with the '18 CVO was riding behind me while we were in northern Montana doing 100+, he said he won't ride behind me any longer unless I figure this out
I can set my cruise at 100MPH layback with my head on the back seat and put my feet above the windscreen and ride for an hour (on straight roads). No matter how many tar snakes or bumps I can almost fall asleep. I guess I'm lucky, the shark just runs straight.
Well, my cruise has a max of 92, but I get what you are saying, and it is only in wide sweepers when I am doing more that 75-80. Otherwise, I have zero issues, and the bike handles great.
I can take my hands off the bars in cruise, no problem...straight as an arrow.
The stock suspension blows, and I would be replacing it even if I had no wobbles.
That video is rather interesting. How is the engine and swingarm twist related? Does the swingarm pivot go through the rear engine mount? I thought that the hockey puck looking isolators on the frame were the connection point. If twisting the engine over affects the distance from the axle to upper mount then it's most likely just twisting the entire frame. Don't like it, but maybe my understanding is wrong.
A little I can stand. Mine is getting pretty spirited, enough that my buddies on my 6 are backing off...we stop and they are saying "dude, what is up with that thing??" LOL
I will be checking mine as per the video. Will report back. Good luck!
That video is rather interesting. How is the engine and swingarm twist related? Does the swingarm pivot go through the rear engine mount? I thought that the hockey puck looking isolators on the frame were the connection point. If twisting the engine over affects the distance from the axle to upper mount then it's most likely just twisting the entire frame. Don't like it, but maybe my understanding is wrong.
Ronnie's Harley-Davidson has an excellent microfiche parts catalog. In looking through it, and looking how the mounting goes, it does not seem like that top engine strut could do much of anything to twist the motor/transmission/swingarm enough to realign the swing arm. There appears to be a pin that locates both the rear of the transmission and swingarm in the frame. Maybe the frame mounts have some sort of eccentric property to them to realign them, otherwise, it does not seem like that would work:
I would also think using a camber gauge would be more accurate to check to see if the rear was tweaked than that gauge. Shock mounts are not pickup points, and their locations matter little in the grand scheme of things.
I found this interesting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAW8eM8A124 Just passing it along for information purposes. I haven't had the time to wrap my head around what he goes over, just found it interesting.
This set up is way too expensive and complicated.
It can be done with a $5.00 angle finder from Harbor Freight or even a short bubble level.
What I do is strap down the front of the bike. Adjust the straps until bike is strait up and down. Use the angle finder or bubble level on the front brake rotor to check.
Now check the rear brake rotor, if it's not strait up and down then you need to adjust the top brace. Older bikes are adjustable, new bikes are not and need to be replaced.
This method works on Dynas also.
Ronnie's Harley-Davidson has an excellent microfiche parts catalog. In looking through it, and looking how the mounting goes, it does not seem like that top engine strut could do much of anything to twist the motor/transmission/swingarm enough to realign the swing arm. There appears to be a pin that locates both the rear of the transmission and swingarm in the frame. Maybe the frame mounts have some sort of eccentric property to them to realign them, otherwise, it does not seem like that would work:
I would also think using a camber gauge would be more accurate to check to see if the rear was tweaked than that gauge. Shock mounts are not pickup points, and their locations matter little in the grand scheme of things.
I agree. I have the FSM at home. On my race bike I have some tools to measure the axle position relative to the swingarm pivot. As long as the frame is straight, this is the true zero and the only measurement that matters. I don't know why HD uses a design where the swingarm pivot can move in space relative to the main frame.
That video is rather interesting. How is the engine and swingarm twist related? Does the swingarm pivot go through the rear engine mount? I thought that the hockey puck looking isolators on the frame were the connection point. If twisting the engine over affects the distance from the axle to upper mount then it's most likely just twisting the entire frame. Don't like it, but maybe my understanding is wrong.
the frame is seperate from the engine swingarm, its to isolate the road from the rider, and hence why one th etouring bikes do this. they share this odd frame that basically flexes sideways in the middle if not setup right.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.