When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've never done either and never plan to simply because I've never had any indication why I needed to improve something or mitigate some problem..my 'solution' to the 'problem' of re-combusting the breather residue has always been to combust the Hell out of it by using the rpm range I paid for often
One of these days all those "I'm keeping my bike stock, it's the greatest thing since ice cream' blaa bla blaa is going to turn and something is going to go wrong and that absolutely perfect bike won't be so perfect anymore.
The TAX
One of these days all those "I'm keeping my bike stock, it's the greatest thing since ice cream' blaa bla blaa is going to turn and something is going to go wrong and that absolutely perfect bike won't be so perfect anymore.
The TAX
oh well, so far so good anyway..same as my plan to live forever
I've never done either and never plan to simply because I've never had any indication why I needed to improve something or mitigate some problem..my 'solution' to the 'problem' of re-combusting the breather residue has always been to combust the Hell out of it by using the rpm range I paid for often
This is the best answer. ^^^^^^
No need to go any further.
The two are not related in any way. I did both and used inline clear fuel filters for the filter and drained to ground. The top end filter collects moisture that can be seen and the crankcase vent picks up a tiny bit of oil. Venting the top end into the breather is not an engineering "best practice" it is an EPA requirement, I prefer to go with the best practice. I cannot say if the crankcase vent is actually needed but it sure cant hurt. In the end it is an individuals choice.
The two are not related in any way. I did both and used inline clear fuel filters for the filter and drained to ground. The top end filter collects moisture that can be seen and the crankcase vent picks up a tiny bit of oil. Venting the top end into the breather is not an engineering "best practice" it is an EPA requirement, I prefer to go with the best practice. I cannot say if the crankcase vent is actually needed but it sure cant hurt. In the end it is an individuals choice.
Well... these two vents in question, they are trying to vent the same air body (case + oil pan) and if the dipstick vent does a better job, it's possible the moisture in the heads will not be evacuated correctly.
Might not hurt a thing, but could also result in your heads getting packed full of white oily milky puss over a long time of not being vented correctly... Who's to say though.
Well... these two vents in question, they are trying to vent the same air body (case + oil pan) and if the dipstick vent does a better job, it's possible the moisture in the heads will not be evacuated correctly.
Might not hurt a thing, but could also result in your heads getting packed full of white oily milky puss over a long time of not being vented correctly... Who's to say though.
Interesting? are they?... If so I could see a possible issue.
if so I would think the idea of keeping the garbage out of your intake would be the better option of the two. your not really doing anything different except dumping anything coming from the heads to the ground (in my case) instead of into your intake.
the more I think about this, doing both is a non issue
Interesting? are they?... If so I could see a possible issue.
if so I would think the idea of keeping the garbage out of your intake would be the better option of the two. your not really doing anything different except dumping anything coming from the heads to the ground (in my case) instead of into your intake.
the more I think about this, doing both is a non issue
Yes, same air cavity. Think of the whole system like one single pressurized balloon.
Venting dirty air away from the intake is another point. Still vent through the head breathers, but route the hoses elsewhere instead of directly into the intake.
Yes, same air cavity. Think of the whole system like one single pressurized balloon.
Venting dirty air away from the intake is another point. Still vent through the head breathers, but route the hoses elsewhere instead of directly into the intake.
I do vent out the heads... to the ground... I can't see the vented dipstick added would hurt anything
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.