When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
So Kevin do you use these with or without the baffles in a 4" Rush Big Louie ? Stock 103 Triglide with decatted stock head pipes and nightriders. Ebert
So Kevin do you use these with or without the baffles in a 4" Rush Big Louie ? Stock 103 Triglide with decatted stock head pipes and nightriders. Ebert
I've run them both ways...with and without baffles.
For Mary's ears I am running them with baffles for the last 8 or 9 months.
The best power is no baffles, but they are LOUD.
Using baffles, especially if they are wrapped, and then a TTI will give you a good mellow low tone, and the TTI will still give a bump in low and mid range torque.
I think you are currently running a 2" baffle. If I were you, I would install the TTI's along with those same baffles. You will see a bump in torque, and the tone will deepen.
If it is still too loud/bad resonance for you, then I would wrap the baffle with some fiberglass. That will lower the tone even more, and it will take a lot of the sharp edges off of the sound. That would be better powerwise & costwise than going to a 1 3/4" baffle.
Thanks Kevin , I am on a witch hunt trying to get rid of resonance when wearing a helmet ! Riding for an extended period my ears are stuffy after removing helmet and can't hear well for several hours . Almost like altitude pressure when flying , but no swallowing or popping for relief . lol Ebert
Thanks Kevin , I am on a witch hunt trying to get rid of resonance when wearing a helmet ! Riding for an extended period my ears are stuffy after removing helmet and can't hear well for several hours . Almost like altitude pressure when flying , but no swallowing or popping for relief . lol Ebert
I wonder if your helmet might be a contributing factor? Some helmets are noisier than others.
On my modular helmet I had to adjust the padding to get it closer to my ears, reducing the wind noise.
I recently installed the Target Tune module on my Tri Glide. I already had Auto Tune and the Wide Band O2's so the install was relatively easy. I have run the TT and am happy with the tune. However it has cut my gas mileage for my "local cruising" down by about 2 MPG. I do not care about top end speed and super fast acceleration on a 1400 lb (with rider) trike, but I do like low and mid range torque. I really only accelerate wide open when passing in 4th-5th gear or accelerating quickly when entering traffic etc. I will work on the mileage problem and the tune later. I would love to be able to get back to about 34 MPG while traveling.
Now for my Thunder Torque question. I am running Fuelmoto ceramic head-pipes, DK outlaw AC kit with breather and Fuelmoto "Classic 3 1/2 inch slip on's. Looking at DK's info page for the TTI it shows that you should base the size of the TTI on the actual size of the opening in the slip on or if you leave the baffles in, you base it on the size of the opening in the baffle. Am I understanding this correctly? I don't think I want to take the baffles out. The baffles in the 3 1/2 inch slip on's are 2 inch in size. So that looks like I need the 158 size? However if I decide to take the baffles out, I then would need the 258? I really don't want to end up buying two sets. I am looking for any torque gains I can get, especially low and mid range. Am I thinking correctly about the size of the TTI? Thanks for any help.
The picture below is the best I could get at this time with the weather rainy. You can at least see that the outside area of the baffle takes up the all the space inside the slip on and the opening in the baffle is 2 inches. Ooops, didn't mean to make it that big.
Last edited by so60; Feb 10, 2018 at 02:24 PM.
Reason: Link and pic.
I recently installed the Target Tune module on my Tri Glide. I already had Auto Tune and the Wide Band O2's so the install was relatively easy. I have run the TT and am happy with the tune. However it has cut my gas mileage for my "local cruising" down by about 2 MPG. I do not care about top end speed and super fast acceleration on a 1400 lb (with rider) trike, but I do like low and mid range torque. I really only accelerate wide open when passing in 4th-5th gear or accelerating quickly when entering traffic etc. I will work on the mileage problem and the tune later. I would love to be able to get back to about 34 MPG while traveling.
Now for my Thunder Torque question. I am running Fuelmoto ceramic head-pipes, DK outlaw AC kit with breather and Fuelmoto "Classic 3 1/2 inch slip on's. Looking at DK's info page for the TTI it shows that you should base the size of the TTI on the actual size of the opening in the slip on or if you leave the baffles in, you base it on the size of the opening in the baffle. Am I understanding this correctly? I don't think I want to take the baffles out. The baffles in the 3 1/2 inch slip on's are 2 inch in size. So that looks like I need the 158 size? However if I decide to take the baffles out, I then would need the 258? I really don't want to end up buying two sets. I am looking for any torque gains I can get, especially low and mid range. Am I thinking correctly about the size of the TTI? Thanks for any help.
The picture below is the best I could get at this time with the weather rainy. You can at least see that the outside area of the baffle takes up the all the space inside the slip on and the opening in the baffle is 2 inches. Ooops, didn't mean to make it that big.
If the diameter of the inner circle in the photo above (the opening in the end of the baffle) is 2", then a W158, centered in that hole/opening is what you want.
You will get a nice bump in low and mid range torque. You may see a small increase in MPG also.
Thanks Kevin for the quick post and reply. I was able to cut a short piece of a Q tip stick to 2 inches and work it up in there with a long pair of needle nose pliers without having to take the baffle out to measure. It looks like the baffle would probably come out pretty easily, but this was quicker and cleaner. It is just a little over 2 inches but close enough for me. I will order the 158 size.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.
It is just a little over 2 inches but close enough for me. I will order the 158 size.
