Solid wheels vs spoked
Thanks all for ur responses. Possibly correct on the aerodynamics. Possibly due to hw I sit and my each as well
but a compressor on a spinning wheel? Sorry that is flawed for sure. What is the wind pressure and the repetition speeds? Small amounts of air on a spinning object, of course it will deflect. When wind hits something revolving it does not just deflect, it looks for a way out so it will collect and go with the repetition of the revolving object. A myth buster? Possible. I still think the solid wheels play a certain part in the bike being pushed by cross winds as it has nowhere to escape.
Anyhow ill I’ll start by changing up my bars and bringing them closer to me to change my seating position
but a compressor on a spinning wheel? Sorry that is flawed for sure. What is the wind pressure and the repetition speeds? Small amounts of air on a spinning object, of course it will deflect. When wind hits something revolving it does not just deflect, it looks for a way out so it will collect and go with the repetition of the revolving object. A myth buster? Possible. I still think the solid wheels play a certain part in the bike being pushed by cross winds as it has nowhere to escape.
Anyhow ill I’ll start by changing up my bars and bringing them closer to me to change my seating position
There are a lot of people that state the the Fat Boy's solid wheels act like sails and make the bike very susceptible to being blown around in the wind..
But, when you look at the cross section of various bikes, the wind sail theory doesn't hold water. Look at the Heritage, for example, it has more side surface area than the Fat Boy, even though the wheels are spoked.
But even the breakout with the minimal, cast wheels; by the time you ad in the surface area of the disk-breaks and tires, the difference in surface area is not significant. Certainly less significant than a passenger would be, i.e., a breakout with a passenger would be more prone to being blown around by the wind than a Fat Boy.*
I am not an expert in aerodynamics, but on the surface, the theory is full of holes.
*There are other variables, like the tire size, but, I believe the argument still holds (just my opinion)
But, when you look at the cross section of various bikes, the wind sail theory doesn't hold water. Look at the Heritage, for example, it has more side surface area than the Fat Boy, even though the wheels are spoked.
But even the breakout with the minimal, cast wheels; by the time you ad in the surface area of the disk-breaks and tires, the difference in surface area is not significant. Certainly less significant than a passenger would be, i.e., a breakout with a passenger would be more prone to being blown around by the wind than a Fat Boy.*
I am not an expert in aerodynamics, but on the surface, the theory is full of holes.
*There are other variables, like the tire size, but, I believe the argument still holds (just my opinion)
Nothing technical/theoretical but was recently caught in heavy side wind on my new fat boy following an older heritage with spokes. Effect of wind seemed same on both - e.g. both of us were getting blown sideways about same amount from what I could tell.
In heavy winds, you're gonna feel the wind regardless of wheels. BUT... Solid FatBoy Wheels will cause even more of a push in heavy winds. Harley tried to correct this on newer FatBoys by drilling holes in later model wheels. That being said, the spokes will make a difference.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post















