When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Would love some input on this decision. I currently have the opportunity to purchase either a 2000 Deuce for about $8,500, or a 2005 Deuce for $10,500. They both have about the same number of miles (between 8,000 and 10,000.)
I've been riding metrics for almost 40 years and this would be my first Harley. Could you give me your opinion on which direction you would go and why? They both are in standard configuration with few add-ons.
My 2002 is the first EFI bike I've owned. It's the way to go, in my opinion. Starts up does the high idle thing for a short time, then you are ready to go.
I guess I was wondering about any changes or upgrades from 2000 to 2005 that would be an obvious decision-maker. EFI is certainly something to think about. Anything else that would be worth the extra $2,000?
does one seem to grab your fancy more than the other? If so that is the one to go with. Sometimes for no specific reason something jumps at you more than the other
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.