95 kit & compression
Where I live we can still get 92 octane "real gas" (not the blended crap), so I probably could have gone with a higher compression. Friend of mine is running 10.5:1 without any problems using the same fuel.
But I stayed with 10.25:1 instead of going higher because I make a lot of long runs on the bike, and didn't want to worry using lower quality gas if need be.
I might have gained a couple of extra horsepower going with a higher compression, but the piece of mind of not worrying about fuel issues in different areas of the country is worth it to me.
.
But I do agree that if you go with the 95" build you might as well upgrade the cams at the same same. Easier to do it then than later. Depending on how much you want to spend it's also a good time to 'clean up the heads' if you are looking for substantial horsepower gains.
One of the most populat cams out there right now is the SE 255. It's a high lift cam (lift 550/550, duration 211/235), and provides a nice torque increase in the low to mid RPM range.
Others like the SE 204, which will show nice power increases in the mid to upper RPM range. It has a lift of 508/508 and a duration of 236/240.
I'm running the SE 258 in my 95" TC. They are a little more radical (lift of 550/550 duration of 258/258) and provide excellent horsepower and torque numbers in the mid to upper RPM range. But if using the SE 255's you will also need to go with adjustable pushrods, and something like the SE valve spring kit.
But with good cams and some headwork it's not difficult to build a very dependable 95" TC engine that puts out 90 to 100 RWHP, even if you limit the compression to the 10.25:1 range because of fuel concerns.
Last edited by mike06train; Nov 27, 2009 at 09:10 PM.







