When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
We don't do extended trips, wifes medical problem, we do 2-4 hrs rides when she can with decent weather.
I'll say I rode a RK this fall at the Demo days for bout an hr.. At 6'2" 280 I am not small, a couple friends said I need a touring bike, said its better and smoother for someone my size.
My first impression upon sitting on the RK was just that, I felt like I was sitting on top of a bike instead of in it. The Heritage just feels better for me.
Then the bars are lower, not made for someone who has shattered a lower vertebrae.
Ergonomics are not fitting for me, bars just didn't fit me. Whereas the Heritage mini apes are better and as comfortable after a 4-5 hr ride as when I first get on.
I expected the RK to give a overall smoother ride as we rode through the country most where rough and bumpy, then about 15mins on the interstate. But after riding the King I'll just say IMO I wouldn't trade my Heritage for a RK.
I had my test ride and was not impressed with it at all.
The RK for me didn't handle as well, nor ride any better. I had a hard time keeping her straight on the interstate, just kept wsandering left-right-left-right.......
Maybe it would be better out on the road on long long trips???.
Right after we got back I got on our Heritage and took the same route as with the RK, and decided then I''ll keep what I have.. And never look back....
I know there are a lot of RK owner that are completely happy with there bike, and thats great..
I aml just saying I am perfectly happy with our Heritage and will keep her...
There are to many variables.Nobody can tell someone else what's best for HIM. Everyone is different. The only way to know is to ride em all and come to your own conclusion.
It might be a misconception on my part, but do you think that alot of people go out and buy a RK because it is BIG ?
In the past few years we were caught up in this era of "bigger is better, gotta get the biggest". ex. BIG SUV's, BIG TRUCKS.
Thats so old school now, go out and get what works for you, not what everybody wants you to buy.
First, don't let anyone tell you that one rides "better" than the other. I hear so many say that a Road King rides better than a Heritage. I've ridden both many many times and thats certainly not true...at all! I actually like both bikes and as you can see, most of us buy a bike, then set it up for us...ie, handlebars, lowering kits, changing seats.
Stock however, to me the Heritage wins hands down!
You're putting a ford fusion against a ford crown victoria in terms of comfort...
I have a Fat Boy but feel much more comfy on a SG or a RK, 240lbs and 6'3" jmho.
Mimo.
Glad you said it. The guy who said you need to ride them stock - I'll bet he has a Honda. The bars and seat need to be changed on a lot of Harleys. Just like doing the Stage I. The King has much more riding potential. Yes, the Heritage LOOKS cool. ... ... all except for the studs, which look fruity and more like Greenwich Village than I'm comfortable with...
Last edited by BigGdawg; Jan 22, 2010 at 12:28 PM.
Glad you said it. The guy who said you need to ride them stock - I'll bet he has a Honda. The bars and seat need to be changed on a lot of Harleys. Just like doing the Stage I. The King has much more riding potential. Yes, the Heritage LOOKS cool. ... ... all except for the studs, which look fruity and more like Greenwich Village than I'm comfortable with...
I'll stick with my studs and "fruity" look any day of the week. I'm pretty secure in my sexuality and have never had anyone come up to me and ask what make that "fruity" bike is. To each his own I guess.
softail
+ feel more connected to the road
+ smoother at idle and around town speed
- high frequency vibration at highway speeds
- hit a bump and you know it
touring
+ very smooth at highway speeds
+ cadillac-like ride
+ more bells and whistles
+ lighter "steering" effort
- at bit clumsy at around town speeds
- low frequency "shake" at idle and lower around town speeds
- does not feel "glued" to the road
- ***-end is very light, rear brake is VERY easy to lock up
Glad you said it. The guy who said you need to ride them stock - I'll bet he has a Honda. The bars and seat need to be changed on a lot of Harleys. Just like doing the Stage I. The King has much more riding potential. Yes, the Heritage LOOKS cool. ... ... all except for the studs, which look fruity and more like Greenwich Village than I'm comfortable with...
Nothing against a RK, but see alot of the ladies in my area riding them.
Originally Posted by Heritage632
I'll stick with my studs and "fruity" look any day of the week. I'm pretty secure in my sexuality and have never had anyone come up to me and ask what make that "fruity" bike is. To each his own I guess.
I agree H632. I will stick with my Heritage and all of its "fruity" studs too. I love the ride, and it handles great!
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.