When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hey all, I'm new here and will be purchasing a HD later this summer.
This would be my first cruiser and also first bike in ~10yrs...
The Fat Bob first caught my attention, then the Wide Glide... Then a Softtail caught my eye...
I'm curious what the differences are between Dyna Glides and Soft Tail models are....
After a brief look, it seems the visable rear shocks (Dyna) and hidden suspension (softtail)
I'd mostly be riding around town and taking it up in to to the Foothills of Colorado's front range but also some trips over to Cali and up to Montana as well...
Hey all, I'm new here and will be purchasing a HD later this summer.
This would be my first cruiser and also first bike in ~10yrs...
The Fat Bob first caught my attention, then the Wide Glide... Then a Softtail caught my eye...
I'm curious what the differences are between Dyna Glides and Soft Tail models are....
After a brief look, it seems the visable rear shocks (Dyna) and hidden suspension (softtail)
I'd mostly be riding around town and taking it up in to to the Foothills of Colorado's front range but also some trips over to Cali and up to Montana as well...
Any thoughts would be good...
Thanks!
Junior
There are certainly more knowledgeable people on these forums than me, but I'll jump in a little since nobody else has yet.
One difference is the engine and mounting... current model year Softails use the 96 inch engine with counterbalancers rigidly mounted to the frame. This setup reduces vibration and gives a smoother ride... more like a tourer. The current year Dynas use the same engine, but withOUT counterbalancers and they are rubber mounted to the frame which allows for a lot of engine shake at idle and low RPM.
For 2012, the Softail family will be getting the 103 inch engine while the Dyna line (not sure if all models apply) will still have the 96. Check out the link on this thread (I would look myself, but I am restricted from downloading files on this work computer). https://www.hdforums.com/forum/softa...-exciting.html
Personally, I prefer the look of not having exposed shocks... the Softails look more like rigids.
Last edited by FatVermonter; Jun 18, 2011 at 12:00 AM.
Reason: added 2 cents
Hey Junior, welcome to the forum. I am far from an expert on things Harley but here are a couple of things I know about Dynas and Softails.
1) Dyna owners will claim that their bikes handle almost as well as their old sportbikes.
2) Softail owners will claim that their bikes are smoother than butter and look way cooler than Dynas.
Both are great bikes and you need to test ride a few different models to really know which you like better.
Both will be fine for around town use or cross country trips.
I have a 09' Xrossbones and my buddy has a 11' Wide Glide. We both have a stage 1 upgrade and the Wide Glide feels faster and has better throttle response due to it being 80lbs lighter and the A motor dynoed a few more hp and tq. The ride is completely different as well, the Xbones has much less vibration, and the suspension seems to absorb more of the bumps. The springer front end is a lot firmer than the wide glides and doesn't dive as much under braking. The suspension on the Wide Glide felt soft compared to the xBones, but the handling was lighter and more nimble. To me the Xbones feels more planted to the road and is more of a cruiser, while the WG requires less rider input to react and wants to be ridden more aggressively.
I think both are equally good as they both have plusses and minuses.
You decision should be based on what feels more comfortable to sit on and which one you rather look at everyday.
When I bought my Fatboy, I had to decide between it and a wideglide. I love my bike, but I'd probably go with the dyna the second time around. The softail can make for a rough ride sometimes. I'm guessing the shocks must be pretty stiff due to their short travel and the long travel at the wheel. The counterbalanced engine is nice at idle, but it will vibrate/buzz at higher rpms. It's not bad, but it's there.
There are many significant differences between the Softail and the Dyna families...and there are some pretty significant differences WITHIN each of the families.
As pointed out, one of the biggest is the A vs the B motor.
The only way you're gonna know which one is best for you is to spend some time in the seat of the different ones that you are interested in.
For 2012, the Softail family will be getting the 103 inch engine while the Dyna line (not sure if all models apply) will still have the 96.
The Fat Bob, Switchback (whatever the hell that is) and Wide Glide are also getting a 103".
The looks are different, the motors in the Softails are the B motors for balanced (as people have said), and the suspensions are different..
truth be told, make a list of the bikes you want to test ride, call your dealer and say "Do you have X, Y, and Z in stock? If so, I'd like to take them for a few test rides" and let your butt do the choosing.
As for distance, I've gone 500 miles in <20 hours on my FatBoy Lo and was able to get off the bike and walk around just fine, the ride for me is very nice and comfortable, but it may not be for everyone.. anywho. Yeah. damn 103"'s.
My first Softail was in 91 when I graduated from high school. I rode that bike all the way up til 2001 and sold it. In 2009 I decided to buy another bike and for some ungodly reason decided to buy a Street Bob. Big Mistake!!!!! I did not mind the vibrations, after all it is a Harley. What I did mind was the rear wheel shimmy in the curves. That can be cured with a bracket system that ties the engine and transmission into the frame better. The Dyna Swingarm is mounted directly to the rear of the transmission. The transmission is mounted to the frame via a rubber mount. So when the engine and trans move around because of the rubber mounts, so does the swingarm. It's not a very rigid system. It can feel a little unstable in the smallest of curves because as I said previously the swingarm is basically rubber mounted. Needless to say I now have a Softail Deluxe. So from my experience stock for stock a Dyna doesn't perform near as well as a Softail in smoothness of ride or cornering stability.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.