95 cu in screaming eagle big bore kit
thats the nice part of being single and kids out of the house.... eventually i will have everything done on my deuce as well for my daughter and her family to enjoy without having to buy anything for it. Have we went overboard on the $$$........ yup but its our money and our rides to customize and make em our own and not meet a twin while out riding. And i know the above is in Tonys plans as well.
Tony and myself have basically the same motor components.( tony actually helped me decid on cams) the only real difference is i still have a 5 speed vs his 6 speed.
as for those that disagree about a particular mod Tony its really irrelevant as its what you want to do and pay for..... thats my opinion and my money. lol and actually for what amount of money we have in these scoots what the hell is a couple more..... thousand right lol
Last edited by Juiced_deuce; Nov 23, 2013 at 07:38 PM. Reason: added
Should you wish to bone up on automotive engineering, and the latest junk on making power, we could begin to have a serious conversation.
For others:
Aside from mechanical strength to withstand power and rpms, the ability of an engine to produce power is basically limited by the oxygen available to efficiently burn the fuel. There are lots of different proven strategies for providing more available oxygen, including compressing the intake air, and mixing air with fuel in the combustion chamber in such a way that more of it is used efficiently to produce power, rather than spitting a large portion of the fuel out the exhaust.
One example of bigger isn't always better:
An acquaintance bored and stroked his 440 Chrysler engine to 505 cubic inches. There was no increase in power (dyno tested). The peak power simply moved lower in the rpm range.
Funny thing is that this guy had put the parts and machining into the engine to run 8000 rpm reliably. But the engine made peak power at only 4500 rpm.
Making peak power at 4500 rpm could be good or bad, depending on how you look at it, but the bottom line was that he spent a bunch of money for no power improvement. Duh. Shoulda studied up a little.
Last edited by Warp Factor; Nov 25, 2013 at 04:24 AM.
Also as i had told Tbone earlier in pm, port n polish is fine.... BUT it can also hinder performance as the molecules need some disturbance to bond with fuel/air together
Last edited by Juiced_deuce; Nov 24, 2013 at 06:42 PM.
My 502 Chevy engine (slightly smaller displacement, but with better heads) with a similar cam, made about two hundred more horsepower on the same dyno.
Last edited by Warp Factor; Nov 25, 2013 at 04:27 AM.
there are alot of ways to get the power, hell look at the naturally aspirated 4 and 6 cyl cars nowadays, have as much hp and torque as an v8 of the mid 70's-80s
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
Last edited by Warp Factor; Nov 25, 2013 at 04:29 AM.
The application of the more exotic performance options available for todays automotive power plants to the Harley vtwin motor is not cost effective and, in most instances, when applied is not practical for 99.9% of the folks that ride them.
That is why the most basic performance and most cost effective upgrade is an increase in displacment. Within the context of the Harley vtwin performance capabilities, which is what this and other Harley forums are about, all things being equal, the bigger motor comes out on top every time.







