Touring
If you will be doing alot of highway riding, the sportster can handle it, but you would be more comfortable on a touring bike. If you will be hitting the twisties and traveling on a lot of local rodes, the sportster will be more fun.

(I am thinking of buying a road king or heritage classic for the longer trips so I can have the flexibility of riding two up - but will keep the sportster in any event for local riding and solo trips that don't focus on the highways).
Trending Topics
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
As you will see in most posts, it's not the bike that complains, it's the rider, with suggestions about different seats, windshields, pegs, etc., etc...
I use to travel around the country on a rigid frame chopped '49 Panhead, no front brake and no rear suspension. As you can imagine, it was very rough riding, but the bike itself was perfectly happy traveling from coast to coast.
People travel to the Artic Circle, down to South America and everywhere else on what I would consider very uncomfortable dual sport Kawasaki KLR 650's. I rode one for a few weeks, and about 100 miles was about all I could handle.
A Sportster rides like a luxury car compared to the KLR 650's, yet those guys ride them hundreds of miles a day without complaining....
But, like I mentioned, rider comfort (and not the bike) is the only factor you need to consider.
And as we all know, "required rider comfort" will vary from individual to individual...



