Target Tune?
I can say it runs better than before, but I also did a cam upgrade and heads at the same time so I can't compare the two.
I've pulled logs and viewed in MLV and so far my VE's are tracking on top of each other.
Trending Topics
for me was the throttle response and increased torque below 2000 rpms, that would be from a standing start. This is also the part of the powerband that dynos never show
on their readout. It just made the bike so much more fun to ride.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
As I understand it:
Target Tune (TT) maintains very accurate closed-loop control of the engine, to the parameters of the tune map. It doesn't change or adjust the map, just exercises better adherence to the map loaded in the ECM because of the use of wide band O2 sensors v OEM narrow band O2 sensors. Because of the use of wide band O2 sensors, a larger portion, if not all, of the map is closed-loop v partial closed-loop and open-loop.
So, if you use TT for an auto tune, it is using the better efficiency of the wide band O2 sensors to dial in the VE tables of the current map. Creating a new map that is dialed in to your particular engine. This auto tune session will be better than an OEM basic auto tune because it is using the wide band O2 sensors to dial in the map. I would assume (oops, I made an assumption!) this tune would be more comparable to an auto tune pro session...
Now you have a better dialed in map. You download it to your ECM and now the TT will maintain a very accurate closed loop control of the engine, to the parameters of the better map...
If you start with a canned map (dyno tune would be a different story) for your bike/mods, it would seem that a TT auto tune session would yield better results than a non-TT, basic auto tune session....
It's possible that since the TT is just "converting" the signals of the wide band O2 sensors for use by the OEM ECM, that some of the efficiency of wide band O2 sensors is lost in the translation.... I don't know..
I'd like to better understand the TT process, let me know what I am missing...







