View Poll Results: A poll

No, waste of money.

59.46%

Yes, only if you can afford it.

24.32%

Absolutely all have to match.

16.22%

Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Chrome Rear Rotor/Pulley

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 6, 2007 | 02:45 AM

#11

Arvid

Outstanding HDF Member

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 2,360

Likes: 3

From: Naalehu, Hawaii

RE: Chrome Rear Rotor/Pulley

You'll know its there,I guess my no vote is for myself.

Jun 6, 2007 | 03:43 PM

#12

GMONEY220

Road Warrior

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 1,461

Likes: 14

From: Bay Area 41510 To Vegas!!!

RE: Chrome Rear Rotor/Pulley

Dont bother and besides if you go to a single disc up front or an 360brake,you have an extra for the rear!

Jun 6, 2007 | 07:41 PM

#13

Firetender

Road Warrior

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 1,479

Likes: 4

From: SoCal

RE: Chrome Rear Rotor/Pulley

FRIENDS DON'T LET FRIENDS USE CHROME PULLEY COVERS! Not on FLHs anyway. The chrome cover can dimple under torque,creating tears,allowing 1/8" of slack in the bolts to damage the pulley and also strip the threads in the rear wheel. And this cover had been torqued to spec and red-LocTit'ed. This engine was built, and the owner admits in your garden-variety Hog this may not be an issue. But his experience was enough for me. No pulley covers on my FLH, thanks.

Jun 7, 2007 | 01:49 PM

#14

05Fatty

Thread Starter

Road Master

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 1,058

Likes: 15

From: Minneapolis, MN

RE: Chrome Rear Rotor/Pulley

Unfortunately I'm still kind of mixed on this. I'm one of those people who if you know its there, even if you can't see it that it may bother me not to have it. On the other hand it might be good to save the $500 or so.