95” FLSTF vs 96” FLHR
Thread Starter
|
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 1,442
From: Brentwood
95” FLSTF vs 96” FLHR
I feel like if I lined my King up next to my old Fatboy that the Fatboy would kick the Kings a$$.
Fatboy was a carbed 95” BB, SE204’s, Thunderheader.
RK is running 96” stock pistons, Slip Ons, SE AC, Andrews 48’s.
So let the discussion begin cammed 96” Touring Bikes vs 95” Big Bore Softails.
I’m putting my money on the lighter Softails.
Fatboy was a carbed 95” BB, SE204’s, Thunderheader.
RK is running 96” stock pistons, Slip Ons, SE AC, Andrews 48’s.
So let the discussion begin cammed 96” Touring Bikes vs 95” Big Bore Softails.
I’m putting my money on the lighter Softails.
Road Master
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 908
Likes: 96
From: Red Deer, AB
Remember if your RK is an 07 or 08 it's higher geared than the fatboy. So it looses light to light but might run it down on the big end. If the RK is 09 and up gearing is the same as the fatboy
Thread Starter
|
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 1,442
From: Brentwood
I had an opportunity to mess with a Fatboy off the line after installing my cams. Walked away from him but he was running at 88” Stage 1.
Girl on a ZX-6R got in the action a couple lights later and showed us how slow our big twins are against a little 636.
Thread Starter
|
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 1,442
From: Brentwood
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
