ThunderMax Timing is RETARDED!
"You gotta give it what it wants".
No two are exactly the same and pipes, air filters, elevation, fuel grade, and on, and on...... all play into the equasion. So, what works for one... may or may not work for another. Some are more finicky than others, but one thing is for sure with all of them, and that is that when ya get it "right" you will know that your time was well spent.
I'm not ******* anybody, and I commend your efforts, but if it would be this easy, I would have already used the timings from my SERT program and applied them to the TMax.................which again, I'm not saying cannot be done, but the conversion would have to be made.
16 in-Hg = 2% Throttle
18 in-Hg = 5% Throttle
20 in-Hg = 10% Throttle
22 in-Hg = 20% Throttle
24 in-HG = 40% Throttle
26 in-Hg = 60% Throttle
28 in-Hg = 80% Throttle
30 in-Hg = 100% Throttle
The sharpest HD engine guy I know, has a saying about tuning.....
"You gotta give it what it wants".
No two are exactly the same and pipes, air filters, elevation, fuel grade, and on, and on...... all play into the equasion. So, what works for one... may or may not work for another. Some are more finicky than others, but one thing is for sure with all of them, and that is that when ya get it "right" you will know that your time was well spent.
I left our last conversation in the past thread scratching my head because if the DTT uses MAP, then it "should be" Speed Density according to the exerpt..
Ok roughly speaking its relationship is approximately like this!
16 in-Hg = 2% Throttle
18 in-Hg = 5% Throttle
20 in-Hg = 10% Throttle
22 in-Hg = 20% Throttle
24 in-HG = 40% Throttle
26 in-Hg = 60% Throttle
28 in-Hg = 80% Throttle
30 in-Hg = 100% Throttle
The sharpest HD engine guy I know, has a saying about tuning.....
"You gotta give it what it wants".
No two are exactly the same and pipes, air filters, elevation, fuel grade, and on, and on...... all play into the equasion. So, what works for one... may or may not work for another. Some are more finicky than others, but one thing is for sure with all of them, and that is that when ya get it "right" you will know that your time was well spent.
hell yeahh the sharpest guy gave my scoot what it wanted.... turns out its what i wanted too.......a great running bike....
__________________________________________
What is the difference between speed-density and alpha-N fuel injection control systems?
[blockquote]
The OE DelphiÂŽ system is a speed-density control system. It remains a speed-density control system even when devices such as the RevTech DFO, Dynojet Power Commander, or Screaming Eagle EFI Tuner are added. The TCFI is an alpha-N control system.
Speed-density control calculates air flow (and consequently meters the correct amount of fuel to attain the desired air/fuel ratio) based on engine RPM (the speed term) and manifold pressure and temperature (the air density term). Once calibrated, speed-density systems can accurately meter fuel as long as the manifold pressure is well behaved. Speed-density system are somewhat forgiving for minor vacuum leaks and inconsistent throttle body behavior. However, speed-density control cannot cope with the erratic manifold pressure characteristic of long duration, high overlap camshafts.
Alpha-N systems are typically used in racing applications where the camshaft characteristics preclude speed-density control. Alpha-N control calculates airflow based on throttle angle (the alpha term) and engine RPM (the N term). In addition, most alpha-N systems make a correction based on air temperature. The accuracy of an alpha-N system is highly dependent on consistent throttle body behavior and is adversely affected by any vacuum leaks. Adding closed loop feedback from a wideband exhaust gas oxygen sensor greatly improves the accuracy of an alpha-N system. The major advantage is that alpha-N control has no dependence on manifold pressure and is able to tolerate radical camshaft profiles.[/blockquote]
I primary goal is to get the 2200 to 3500 rpm range in control with good pull andthrottle response. Then I will try to expand this upto 4500 rpms. I'm not too worried what high end performance I get at WOT. If I get this thing into the 80-90% satisfaction range, then I'll be very happy. I wasn't there when I initally installed the V&H Big Shot Duals - even after the 500 mile auto tune.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
the air should be clear on what each fuel management system is. That being Alpha N vs. Speed Density... if the DTT uses MAP, then it "should be" Speed Density according to the exerpt..
That being Alpha N vs. Speed Density, otherwise our communication ain't jiving.
I left our last conversation in the past thread scratching my head because if the DTT uses MAP, then it "should be" Speed Density according to the exerpt..

Darren.....
Let me try again... I was trying to answer that, but I probably strayed in my rambling.
The DTT does NOT use MAP for fuel delivery calcualtions. It it did, it would be a Speed Density device.
The DTT does read MAP and use it, in relation to RPM to manage TIMING.
The terms "Speed Density" and "Alpha-N" are used to describe fuel delivery systems (injector pulse width and spray intervals).
While ignition timing (when plugs fire)is part of the overall equasion and the controllers are housed in a common box, it is a totally separate control system thanthe fuel delivery system. DTT uses MAP for ingnition timing only - NOT fuel delivery. That does not make it a Speed Density system.
Sorry if my other post was unclear or ambiguous.


