Your Opinion Requested
I'm 6 foot 4 and weigh 280. I currently own a Suzuki Blvd C-90T and am looking at the Street Glide. I'm long legged and the C-90T is my first bike. I have several questions that I encourage feedback on. Is the Street Glide a good bike for my frame and height? Is it enough bike (I handle the C-90T fairly well and can throw it around pretty good)? Will the Street Glide's low windshield cause any problems (my head sits just above the shield on the C-90T)? Finally, which is the better bike? Should on stay (C-90T) or should I go (Street Glide)?
First thing to go is the short "wind deflector," which isn't a windshield at all. There are numerous aftermarket alternatives (Clearview, Cee Bailey, HD, etc.) that come in a variety of sizes, shapes, colors, shades, and opacities. The second things to go are the 12" shocks, which will certainly be unsatisfactory for someone of your size. I weigh 170 lbs. and immediately realized the stock shocks had to go, especially after hitting a few bumps that shoved my butt into my chin thanks to the shorter suspension travel. I opted to fit some 12½" Progressive 440's on the bike, which are a big improvement. You might also consider stock 13" air shocks with a 1" lowering kit (e.g., Burly Brothers), the shocks being available used on Ebay for a song ($50-100) with the lowering kit another $100. Or, if the lowered look isn't important to you, just 13" air shocks would be a big improvement--as at your size you certainly wouldn't have a problem flat-footing a bike with 13" shocks.
I also added saddlebag guards to protect the bags in case it should fall over, and to attach saddlebag guard bags, which learned to appreciate on my old RK. You can pick used guards up for $100 or so on Ebay, as some people with conventional FLH's want to get rid of them to achieve the leaned-out SG look. After doing this and adding cruise control, oil cooler, oil-temp gauge, decent grips, Tour Pak with detachable rack, and a few other functional mods, you'll have a first-rate touring bike that looks good to boot. Nothing's perfect and is made to modify, so be prepared to spend a few $$ after you ride out of the dealership on your new ride. One thing you won't find with an HD is a dearth of aftermarket parts to customize your bike. In fact, the vast selection may prove daunting.
I would test ride an SG and an FLHTC (EG Classic) for comparison. They're similar price-wise and the EGC has a Tour Pak standard, a $1000+ option for the SG (with rack and backrest), a real windshield, passing lamps, and saddlebag guards. It is a bargain in function over style when compared to the SG, but you'll have to decide your own priorities.
As for whether or not you'll like an HD better than your Suzuki is yet another matter. To some including me HD offers an intangible that can't easily be put into words, and prompts the old adage "If you must ask, you wouldn't understand." To put it into perspective, I owned a Suzuki Intruder at one time that I put 4900 miles on in three years, and I was actually happy when someone rear-ended me saving me the trouble of selling it. It was a fine bike, well-engineered and reliable, but there was something missing--an intangible that to this day I can't quite put my finger on. Something emotional happened with my next bike, an HD Dyna, and I put 26.5k miles on it in 18 months. Next came an HD Roa
Just some food for thought. Good luck on your decision.
Well for me these fine flock of HD ridersare being way to kind BUY A HARLEY SG.(period ) [sm=icon_cheers.gif]I can't even see why there is a question of which bike!?........................[sm=icon_rofl.gif]
iclick said it "If you must ask, you wouldn't understand." To put it into perspective, I owned a Suzuki Intruder at one time that I put 4900 miles on in three years, and I was actually happy when someone rear-ended me saving me the trouble of selling it.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders






