Here's the dyno results done today.


Here's the chart showing the difference between the old dyno with just the SE A/C and D&D and the new one with the cam

 

Dawg: Thanks for posting. I'm surprised that the torque number isn't higher because my '04 EG bone stock 88 w/ HQ-0034 cams (.500 lift), Rinehart TD's and SE a/c makes 90 tq and low 80's in hp with a decent SERT tune.

 

I'm wondering about the TQ as well as the dip at 3.5K. Seems like a more prnounced dip than the Fatcat usually has. For a comparison, here's my chart after the stage 1 upgrades. The cams definitely woke up your HP number quite a bit.

I'm also wondering what your impression of the sprocket change is? I've been thinking of doing this.

 

Did Dawg go with a 103" kit or something, if not I think he's over camned, my freinds stock 07 Glide with rineharts pulled 85 tq, I'm not trying to make anyone feel bad I'm just sayin.

 

it does look over camned.....jmo

 

Dawg, it that a read only and no tuning?

 

I am surprised as well because my '07 RK is making approx 92 ft-lb of torque with the set up listed below, after a tuning that is.

 

The hp looks prettygood. Tq is at least 10 ft. lbs short maybe 15.

 

That's not a read only, it was a tune. It's with the 575 redshift cams and I agree it is probably over cammed for a stock 96. Zippers claims that to be a bolt in cam for the 96, but also useable for the 103 with dished pistons. I do plan on going 103 and will use the dish pistons and see where I'm at. I have no "butt dyno" feel for it yet because the only ride I took with it was the other day on crappy roads to the shop so I can't tell how it feels for either the cam or the EVO 30 tooth sprocket. I'm also sure that a more experienced tuner could've brought up some different numbers.

 

Dawg,
I have to agree the tq #'s are low I had my bike on the dyno so a frend did some pulls with his 2007 softtail 96" stage 1 with slipons all stock and pulled low 90's ( 4th gear pull). But keep in mind all dyno's are not created equil.