How good is Royal Purple Synthetic oil....Really?
The grade has nothing to do with oils being better or higher than the next. Nor is color a way to see if your oil is better
I used the 20w50 "car oil" in my '96 RK and at 106k miles (trade-in time) the heads had never been removed, static compression unchanged from 1998 (first check), and oil consumption had also not changed. It is still running today with >120k miles on the clock. Will another high-quality synthetic brand do as well? Undoubtedly.
I think the accessibility issue is important, as well as price. I still use RP in my '07 SG, car, and lawn tractor--and get it from a distributor at dealer cost. He also delivers it to my door. I buy by the pail (5 gal.) and save a good bit per quart. Ask your station operator if he can order by the pail and have him quote you a price. You'll have to measure each time, but I use a gallon juice container from Wal-Mart and marked the sides for 3˝ quarts. I just pour the oil in to the mark and dump in in the bike using a funnel. Put the container and funnel in a garbage bag and tie-wrap the ends tightly to seal it, and this way you won't have to wash it out for each use.
There have been several tests on oil conducted by motorcycle magazines (Motorcycle Consumer News, American Iron, and QuickThrottle). The conclusion I made was that some oil performs better at some phases of the tests, others on other phases. Overall, based on these tests I wouldn't hesitate to run any of the major brands in my bike or car. Arguably the best oil for the money is Mobil 1 15w50, available from Wal-Mart for ~$22 per 5-gal. bottle. This was born out by all these tests, which all poo-pooed the concept that "car oil" was bad for a motorcycle.
Also, beware of the Amsoil "White Paper," which was commissioned, designed, and paid-for by Amsoil. It is not an independent test and should be judged accordingly, IMO. For example, their "wear-ball" test is really irrelevant to conditions in an internal-combustion engine. RP has used this test for years and I've witnessed a demonstration where RP beat numerous contenders, including Amsoil. I still think this test is irrelevant. The Amsoil test also eliminates any mention of moly in the formula, which is an important though costly anti-friction additive that's used by most high-quality synthetic manufacturers. It is not moly-disulfide, which hasn't been used as an oil additive for decades. Some Amsoil distributors make generic claims on their sites that "moly" causes valve-train damage in diesel engines, but they fail to mention that this is irrelevant to modern formulations that include moly, none of which contain moly disulfide. Amsoil does not use moly additives in any of their products that I'm aware of. All that said, I would like to say again that Amsoil is an excellent oil, but sometimes their marketing practices border upon hyperbole and innuendo.
Last edited by iclick; Sep 24, 2008 at 02:29 PM.
So if you change the RP every 3,000 miles, then it should be fine.
So if you change the RP every 3,000 miles, then it should be fine.
If the standing in the sheer-stability tests refers to the Amsoil White Paper, I would invite you to refer instead to an independent test like one of those listed in my previous post.
Thanks again.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders


