When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
And the answer is: yes, it will bolt on.
But the setting of the new shocks is totally different: it will not work properly on the "old" frame (too stiff).
Concerning the CVO SG shocks, it may improve the ride for a heavy guy, and only on the new frame. But if you're a light weight (like me), it also doesn't work, even on a 09/10/11 FLH.
For the same money, you can easily find better shocks!
You seem to be up to speed on these new shocks, what is the significance? I know the frame design changed, but has the geometry of the suspension changed, or the mount points for the shocks? Just curious, cause we tried the fluid change in the 09s and didn't have nearly the favorable effect as in my 06s.
I needed to lower the rear on my Ultra and did not want to go with the Air Shock-12" like most do.
I went and bought the Progressive 940 shocks. They are pricey but they are soooo much better on the road and the ride feels alittle stronger? No bottoming out you can spin them with your hand when you need to change them for ride or weight?
They sit at 12" height and have the travel of the 13" shock, it is a little weird but read the write up on them they are VERY GOOD and you will have a much better ride if you get them and get the 1" drop you need ?
On my 09 SG I removed the stock 12in shocks and replaced them with a set of new take off 2010 13in RK shocks then lowered the rear back down with a good deal I found on a Arlen Ness 1in lowering kit. Now I have a smoother ride and the bike sits the same.
I had the older SG shocks on my 06 Standard and now I have the newer model on my 09 Classic.I find the newer shock is smoother,tighter feeling and much more planted than the older shock.I'm sure that the new frame and swing arm helps in this area too,but the shocks don't seem to be as harsh as the old ones.It took me a while to find the correct air pressure.It seems to be 25-30 psi for me (165 lbs) riding solo.
On my 09 SG I removed the stock 12in shocks and replaced them with a set of new take off 2010 13in RK shocks then lowered the rear back down with a good deal I found on a Arlen Ness 1in lowering kit. Now I have a smoother ride and the bike sits the same.
Tell me more of this Arlen Ness lowering kit. I want to go 1 inch lower but I want to keep my stock shocks for the exact reason. I am thinking the 12 inch shocks will make the ride a little stiff with 2 up. Thanks
On my 09 SG I removed the stock 12in shocks and replaced them with a set of new take off 2010 13in RK shocks then lowered the rear back down with a good deal I found on a Arlen Ness 1in lowering kit. Now I have a smoother ride and the bike sits the same.
That is a kick a$$ idea! I might have to give that a try after I get myself some newer 13in shocks to try out and see how I like them. Please do post some info on the lowering kit you are using.
I know the frame design changed, but has the geometry of the suspension changed, or the mount points for the shocks? Just curious, cause we tried the fluid change in the 09s and didn't have nearly the favorable effect as in my 06s.
I'm not sure, but I think the angle between the shocks and the swing arm is slightly different: that's probably why you need stiffer shocks.
Originally Posted by dansflhti
I had the older SG shocks on my 06 Standard and now I have the newer model on my 09 Classic.I find the newer shock is smoother,tighter feeling and much more planted than the older shock.I'm sure that the new frame and swing arm helps in this area too,but the shocks don't seem to be as harsh as the old ones.It took me a while to find the correct air pressure.It seems to be 25-30 psi for me (165 lbs) riding solo.
You mean you have the newer 13" or still SG shocks?
Of course, the new 13" are much better than the 12" (more travel and not so stiff).
Anyway, the weight of the tour pack on a Classic makes a big difference, compared to a naked SG: it's like carrying a (light) passenger all the time.
I'm 155 lbs I believe (71 kg), and I've tried all the air pressure settings from 0 to 30psi: that's allways too hard (above 25 psi the bike even "rebounds" on its shocks).
But, as I've said above, the kind of roads you're riding on makes also the difference: I guess that driving in North America or in Europe is not the same game!
Tell me more of this Arlen Ness lowering kit. I want to go 1 inch lower but I want to keep my stock shocks for the exact reason. I am thinking the 12 inch shocks will make the ride a little stiff with 2 up. Thanks
Mark
I just basically put on the 13in shock for more travel/smoother ride. The lowering kit is one made by Arlen Ness and with the 1in drop, it basically just dropped the rear of the bike back down to the original height. I was just saying I got a good deal on it along with a good deal on the "new" take off shocks. There are many companies making lowering kits.
I'm not sure, but I think the angle between the shocks and the swing arm is slightly different: that's probably why you need stiffer shocks.
You mean you have the newer 13" or still SG shocks?
Of course, the new 13" are much better than the 12" (more travel and not so stiff).
Anyway, the weight of the tour pack on a Classic makes a big difference, compared to a naked SG: it's like carrying a (light) passenger all the time.
I'm 155 lbs I believe (71 kg), and I've tried all the air pressure settings from 0 to 30psi: that's allways too hard (above 25 psi the bike even "rebounds" on its shocks).
But, as I've said above, the kind of roads you're riding on makes also the difference: I guess that driving in North America or in Europe is not the same game!
I have the 09 and up low shocks( 09 SG Shocks) on my 09 classic.The roads here on the East Coast of Canada aren't the best.We are going through the freeze/thaw cycle here now.But I hope to be riding in 3-4 weeks.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.