Dyno Results 07 SG 103 Stage 2 SE255
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 50
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Let's also keep in mind the engine only had 500 miles on it when dyno-tuned. Give it some time to loosen-up and I think you'll see the numbers increase. I just love looking at flat TQ curves.
Road Master
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 795
Likes: 1
From: Douglasville, Ga
Just got in from picking up my
Ultra Limited. I already had the FuelMoto stage1. Had TW555's installed and dynoed at 91.40 HP and 105.58 TQ. I was trying to beat a major storm so I only got to ride it from dealer to home (16 mi), but I like it!
Road Captain
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 739
Likes: 2
From: St. Louis
OK, since nobody has mentioned it yet, I guess I'll go ahead and ask. Why did the tuner tune WOT at approx 14:1 A/F ratio instead of going for 13:1 ? I was always under the impression that the fuel injected bikes liked 13:1 AFR for best TQ/HP. Isn't 14:1 a little lean? Good numbers for sure, but I think there's some more HP/TQ to be had.
Last edited by Gearhead3; Mar 26, 2011 at 05:05 PM.
Road Master
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Likes: 3
From: Charlotte, N.C.
how did you gather that info... I gained more then that. if you are basing your info on the dyno chart ok...
But the two pulls that are shown on the chart are from several pulls not from the original stock pull. Hope that clarifies.
A stock 96 street glide has roughly 78hp and 92lbs...
I think my numbers 86hp to 102.5lbs is a great up grade and well worth the money considering I only payed 450 for a new 103 stage 2 including se 255 cams...
Money well spent for me.
But the two pulls that are shown on the chart are from several pulls not from the original stock pull. Hope that clarifies.
A stock 96 street glide has roughly 78hp and 92lbs...
I think my numbers 86hp to 102.5lbs is a great up grade and well worth the money considering I only payed 450 for a new 103 stage 2 including se 255 cams...
Money well spent for me.
Road Master
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Likes: 3
From: Charlotte, N.C.
OK, since nobody has mentioned it yet, I guess I'll go ahead and ask. Why did the tuner tune WOT at approx 14:1 A/F ratio instead of going for 13:1 ? I was always under the impression that the fuel injected bikes liked 13:1 AFR for best TQ/HP. Isn't 14:1 a little lean? Good numbers for sure, but I think there's some more HP/TQ to be had.
Thread Starter
|
Road Master
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 767
Likes: 1
Other then thatI think the tune came out just fine...bike runs real good now
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Verdad Gallardo
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026
Verdad Gallardo
Southpaw Super Glide: A Left-Hand-Drive 1979 Harley FXE Built to Fit the Rider
Verdad Gallardo
Thread Starter
|
Road Master
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 767
Likes: 1
Thanks man ya I dig it a lot right now. Kinda wish I would have upgraded the cam so my hp would have matched my torque numbers. But it's cool for now.