When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I haven't owned a bike with an exposed rear chain since the 1970s, they are just so last century! As mentioned chains and sprockets don't last as long as a belt and the replacement argument will be easily lost by a high mileage chain bike. What I find frustrating is that modern manufacturing techniques make an enclosed rear chain very easy to do, which would significantly extend chain life, reduce noise and mess.
when you look back and see that belt laying on the ground , you'll wish you had a chain.
So you've never heard of or seen broken chains?! They can both break, the difference between the two being that a chain is much more effective at causing expensive collateral damage........
So you've never heard of or seen broken chains?! They can both break, the difference between the two being that a chain is much more effective at causing expensive collateral damage........
Agreed, but the probability of a quality chain breaking is very slim. All it takes for the belt to fail is a tiny pebble to get trapped between the belt and pulley. My buddy had this happen on a trip a few years back, belt only had 25K. A friend who runs an Indy shop tells me he does a few failed belts a year. His personal bikes have all been converted to chain.
Belts are going to be smoother with a longer life span, but modern O or X ring chains don't stretch as unevenly or as much as standard chain. They also don't require any external lube except something for rust prevention. Modern chain-waxes are a great option to the messy lubes we used to use. I've been using O/X-ring chains on my dirt bikes and Shovelheads for over 20 years with zero issues, but I have no plans to replace the belt on my Road King.
Agreed, belts are smoother, less maintenence, last longer, but why the hell does Harley Davidson designers have their heads up their asses and make it such at major / expensive job to replace the drive belts. If you look at the Victory's and I think the Yamaha's the drive belts are outside the clutch nubs, it looks like it would be about a fifteen minute job to change a belt on a Victory or a Yamaha.
Last edited by jamesroadking; May 16, 2015 at 01:00 PM.
So you've never heard of or seen broken chains?! They can both break, the difference between the two being that a chain is much more effective at causing expensive collateral damage........
agree with you , besides dirt bikes, in all my years of riding i seen one guy break a chain doing wheelies on a chopper. i have seen at least ten belts broken over the years. and you are right about damage with a chain as this happen to a friend of mine. it cost him a trans case. i wouldn't bat an eye at running a chain now days as they are much better than years ago.
Last edited by hardheaded; May 16, 2015 at 08:48 PM.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.