New Cams
Thread Starter
|
Cruiser
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 189
Likes: 2
From: Clancy,Montana
New Cams
just installed woods 777 cams with .030 head gasket, i have vance and hines power duels jackpot power duels and k&n air cleaner,i haven't seen the chart yet but the dealer said it made 83 hp and 93 torque and this was done at 5200 ft above sea level, is good or bad? this is a stock 103 limited.
That's pretty good.
Honestly,peak numbers aren't really that important,it's the numbers where you spend your time riding. And most importantly is are you happy with it.
Are those pipes divorced duals. They will cost you some bottom and mid-range but in all honesty does it make you smile when you twist your wrist.
If you decide you don't like those cams pm me. My 106 would love them.
Honestly,peak numbers aren't really that important,it's the numbers where you spend your time riding. And most importantly is are you happy with it.
Are those pipes divorced duals. They will cost you some bottom and mid-range but in all honesty does it make you smile when you twist your wrist.
If you decide you don't like those cams pm me. My 106 would love them.
Last edited by Shredding rubber; May 11, 2012 at 09:44 PM.
Road Warrior
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Miami, FL
IMO- Those numbers are low for a 103 with those cams, head gasket, and exhaust....
http://www.fuelmotousa.com/dynocharts/TW777.jpg
http://www.fuelmotousa.com/dynocharts/TW777.jpg
Road Warrior
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 56
From: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Take it for a ride before you question how the numbers you got compare to others on the internet. I'll bet you will love the performance increase from the lethargic stocker.
Grand HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,917
Likes: 184
From:
Man I hate it when you do something to a bike and it don't work out but honestly those numbers are a little low for a 103. My bike is a 96" with 204's V&H power duals with 4.5 twinslash monster ovals and it did 90hp and 102tq.
Road Warrior
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 9
From: Cherokee Co. Georgia
Yea, them numbers are kinda low from what I have seen around here. I am not sure how much being a mile above sea level will affect the numbers. I imagine that has something to do with it. What tuner did you go with?
Tourer
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 438
Likes: 6
From: Kamloops BC
With the 555's and a 2-1 exhaust I got 102/10 at 2100', so should certainly be a touch better than what the op was seeing, although at that altitude, figuring roughly 3% per 1000', the difference between his and mine would be a better exhaust...
Trending Topics
Sooo much variation between dynos so don't get caught up in the #'s. Ride it and no worries....
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Verdad Gallardo
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026
Verdad Gallardo
