When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The decomposition rate of tires happens regardless of how you store them. A 7 year life is the absolute max. They are 7 years old now, going into the 8th year does not mean a guaranteed failure, they could last several more years, you never know. If money is tight I would ride the hell out of them then get a new set before next year. Or If you have the money, for peace of mind, just get a new set now.
The tires will probably wear faster than normal and might not have the best feel to them. An 05 Road King with 4000 miles on it, what a waste for someone and a score for you.
I did call Dunlop when I bought my 03 with 2k miles on it last year. They recommend changing tires over 6 years old. Which is what I did.
That is the general advice I have seen and agree with. It is not wise to wait until cracks appear! We all practice preventative maintenance, by changing oils etc at specified intervals of either mileage or age and tyres are the same.
Horrible advice IMO. Polymers age and the performance of the tire is compromised...
Originally Posted by Ron750
I did call Dunlop when I bought my 03 with 2k miles on it last year. They recommend changing tires over 6 years old...
Like I said earlier, any product, tires included, will not go bad overnight at their expiration date.
The degradation occurs gradually over time and while the failure rate may accelerate as time goes on, putting an absolute date on good or no good, safe or unsafe, is a very conservative maneuver to protect manufacturers from liability issues.
While the recommendation from Dunlop is sound advice, I'd still treat it as a point of reference and follow the process given in my previous post, "regular visual inspections and run 'em unless I saw something to tell me differently."
I'm not saying that's what everyone should do as I would, but rather that is what I would do. We are all different when it comes to our own tolerance for risk.
Like I said earlier, any product, tires included, will not go bad overnight at their expiration date.
The degradation occurs gradually over time and while the failure rate may accelerate as time goes on, putting an absolute date on good or no good, safe or unsafe, is a very conservative maneuver to protect manufacturers from liability issues.
While the recommendation from Dunlop is sound advice, I'd still treat it as a point of reference and follow the process given in my previous post, "regular visual inspections and run 'em unless I saw something to tell me differently."
I'm not saying that's what everyone should do as I would, but rather that is what I would do. We are all different when it comes to our own tolerance for risk.
Well, for me tire failure is not an option, I am willing to take. Not knowing how the previous owner inflated the tires was also part of the decision. I would take risks with failure to go. Not willing to risk stop or steer.
Well, for me tire failure is not an option, I am willing to take. Not knowing how the previous owner inflated the tires was also part of the decision. I would take risks with failure to go. Not willing to risk stop or steer.
I hear you! And if that's what it takes for you to feel good then by all means that's what you should do. I'm not questioning anyone's decision on this topic, only sharing mine.
I'll say it again, everyone of us has a different comfort level with the risks we're willing to accept.
Like I said earlier, any product, tires included, will not go bad overnight at their expiration date.
The degradation occurs gradually over time and while the failure rate may accelerate as time goes on, putting an absolute date on good or no good, safe or unsafe, is a very conservative maneuver to protect manufacturers from liability issues.
While the recommendation from Dunlop is sound advice, I'd still treat it as a point of reference and follow the process given in my previous post, "regular visual inspections and run 'em unless I saw something to tell me differently."
I'm not saying that's what everyone should do as I would, but rather that is what I would do. We are all different when it comes to our own tolerance for risk.
A visual inspection won't tell you anything about the hardness or reactivity of the compound. But an emergency braking situation will, and then it's too late.
Well I see I got what I asked for...a lot of different opinions. Since Im put my new 21" and 18" wheels on in 2 months. I'll keep these tires on and stay off the highways for long distance travel. I can't see spending money for tires now then 2 months later spending money again on a set of Avon Cobras. Thanks for the feedback guys!
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.