I think...
So why would "I am, therefore I think." and "I do not think, therefore I am not." fallacies?
How about the fallacy of denying the antecedent (I do not think, therefore I am not)? That one is just absurd. However, for argument's sake, assume that one does not think. If one does not think he would not be able to consider one's own existence to begin with. Therefore the entire argument collapses upon itself.
Bike sounds great!
How about the fallacy of denying the antecedent (I do not think, therefore I am not)? That one is just absurd. However, for argument's sake, assume that one does not think. If one does not think he would not be able to consider one's own existence to begin with. Therefore the entire argument collapses upon itself.
Bike sounds great!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






