When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I agree with everyone so far, the vrod handles like it does because it has to. Takes some getting used to, but it sticks to the pavement better than you might think. And ya, you need the front end to push down, I nearly jerked myself off the bike cuz I pulled onto the highway and gave her a twist. Course, that's when I fell in love...
We had our bike about a week when I found out the neck bearings weren't loose. It was the front wheel making contact with the road in second gear. A friend on a Busa told me I was lifting the front tire about 3" going into second. I've learned not to do that.
I rode the VRSCF last summer and I was blown away. The overall length didn't bother me. However, I'm not sure I loved the forward controls which put you in that "Clam Shell" position but adjustment to it was far easier than I expected. I think I'd prefer the mid mounts like the VRSCR - too bad they are not offering them as an option. But man, that Revolution motor is fantastic!
I do think H-D are their own worst enemy in regards to the V-Rod lineup. Things like not offering mid-controls on any current model is just a dumb move. How expensive could it be to have it as an option? IMO, the forward control layout endears itself to the cruiser rider that has a hard time accepting the V-Rod anyway!
mid controls riding position forward controls riding position.
Which looks like a better, more controlled position?
Yeah, I hear ya, I don't get it. Sometimes I think it's MoCo's marketing of the V-Rod that is what's wrong...not the bike..at least here in USA. Look at what happened with Buell.
Had I been buying a solo bike, I would have bought the Street Rod. Since we were looking for bike to do double-duty we bought the Night Rod. The D with mids and highway pegs suited me just fine. My wife liked the D better than R from a back seat perspective. I'm 6'2" and don't have a problem riding any of the V-rods. I don't much care for the DX. Forward controls and drag bars just don't suit my back. The bars on the F should come back a lot further, in my opinion.
My son is 6'4" and loves the F. It fits him perfect. He doesn't know if he wants red or black.
A couple of us were talking about the F and it's color availability. The bike is ugly in silver. We decided it's because of the brushed stainless pipes. The bike is too monochrome. If it had the black engine from the Night Rods it would look better. Even the half-black B engine wouldn't be enough black to break up all that silver.
I did see one picture of an F painted black on red like my bike. That was a good looking bike. I think it would also be good in a medium blue.
Ahhh, the Street Rod, what a fabulous machine!! Too bad a fairly serious twisty road capable bike didn't make it. The same fate (at least in the USA) probably awaits the most excellent XR1200. The typical Harley customer could care less about handling, it's usually more about how cool (????) raked out front wheels look, how cool a lowered bike looks, how cool the rider looks with legs stretched waaay out front, how many additional pounds of chrome doo-dads can be bolted over parts, etc, etc.
As far as braking capability, you won't find much in the air-cooled Harley world, only one current Dyna (Fat Bob) is equipped with two (marginal) front disc brakes.
As for the comments of needing a longer wheelbase to handle the big power for keeping the front on the ground..... yes.... but KTM, Aprilia and Ducati V-twins that put down serious RWHP 120-170 and big torque combined with short rake and short wheelbase, hundreds of pounds lighter than Harleys manage to operate just fine.
As for the comments of needing a longer wheelbase to handle the big power for keeping the front on the ground..... yes.... but KTM, Aprilia and Ducati V-twins that put down serious RWHP 120-170 and big torque combined with short rake and short wheelbase, hundreds of pounds lighter than Harleys manage to operate just fine.
They also pop the front up everytime you hit it. That's why ninety-nine times out of one-hundred the heavier and slightly less powerful V-Rod will beat any one of those bikes street-light to street-light, and why most "nine second bikes" run between 12 and 13 seconds with you typical rider on them.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.