Bluetooth vs thumb drive?
I have the full Biketronics system and a Sony HU.
In my opinion, when I'm playing music from Spotify via Bluetooth from my phone, the sound quality is more impressive than from using a thumb drive. In my opinion, the sound is more flat using a thumb drive.
But, I have more playlists and they're easier to get to when riding on Spotify, than what I own on thumb drives.
I have the full Biketronics system and a Sony HU.
In my opinion, when I'm playing music from Spotify via Bluetooth from my phone, the sound quality is more impressive than from using a thumb drive. In my opinion, the sound is more flat using a thumb drive.
But, I have more playlists and they're easier to get to when riding on Spotify, than what I own on thumb drives.
When I get the same exact file and play it on my radio via BT or via USB I can go much louder without distortion using a USB. I gotta try with Spotify! Have you tried playingg a track from Spotify via BT and then via USB or Aux cable to see if there's a difference?
Kris
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
You actually set the bitrate for loading the CD's into iTunes, I set mine to the custom rate of 320kbps which is as high as iTunes allows for mp3's, you go into Edit>Preferences>Import Settings and select the settings you want and what encoder if any you want.
Yes, the higher the bitrate the more information it has on the actual sounds it is trying to reproduce. Without giving college courses, hopefully simple explanation, the encoder is reading the song info, and coding it down to whatever size instructed, then a decoder plays the song back when you listen to it, trick here is, the encoder/decoder uses algorithms to replace the music that is missing, these are not always correct and with less information it does not even replace some frequencies because it doesn't know they were even there to begin with, because it has such a low file size.
Wav files are the files CD's are so this type is a direct copy of the music, Lossless files are encoded to close to half the original size and are supposed to reassemble to the original state, several companies have lossless encoders.
I used to only use WAV files, but then I had 3-4TB's of HDD used and no way to put it on any other media that I could use, so I did finally bow down and started using an MP3 rate of 320k no less, and if I download a song I will not accept any less than 256k, if less than this, I just buy the CD and load it myself, this way it is 320k. The downside to this, if it really is a downside is, I only have iPod classic's because nothing else will hold my library, and I have modified the 6 iPod classics I have, two have 256Gb SSD's and 4 have 240GB HDD's, but they have all my 2700+ albums and 36000+ songs, and at a rate that has enough info to reproduce the song. You can take a MP3 at say 128k, one at 320k, and the original WAV file, and play them on a quality system (not a bike system, a home or auto system) and you will hear the difference.
Higher the recorded bit rate = sound better. Now within iTunes for example you can convert a songs bitrate which will make the file smaller or bigger, this is useful when burning to a CD, moving to a drive, etc. However, let's say you downloaded a crappy version of a track from somewhere online and it was 128bps, and you convert it to 320 in iTunes it won't increase the quality of the sound. It will simply make a larger, louder just as crappy version!









