Bassani install challenges
#1
Bassani install challenges
I was super excited to finally have time to install the new pipes. Found out quickly they dont jive with forward controls so later today I'm driving to Tucson to get some used mid controls. The hang up with forward controls is the brake rod, it is not clear of the pipe. Maybe I can bend the brake rod differently or fabricate an entirely new one to make it all work.
My current issue or just a concern is how close the pipe is to the engine case. Is it supposed to be so close that only a piece of paper could fit between the 2? Anyone have experience with this?
My current issue or just a concern is how close the pipe is to the engine case. Is it supposed to be so close that only a piece of paper could fit between the 2? Anyone have experience with this?
#2
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 12,344
Received 2,189 Likes
on
1,677 Posts
#3
I don't have forward controls, but the fit around the cam cover was spot-on for me. Similar to cvaria's pic, the radius around the cone is close, but even all the way around. As he said, take your time lining everything up... Are you sure both pipes are fully seated in the gaskets at the heads? I can't tell from your pictures, but are those taken with the rear bracket already installed and tight? If so, loosen it up again. If you have to do any adjustments (shims, etc), it should be at the rear bracket. The head pipes fit perfectly with mine.
#4
It's hard to tell if the port flange springs are flush inside the flanges but all appears to be flush and straight. I only now noticed on Dennis Kirk it mentions only works with forward controls for 2006 and up so is that what you're running cvaria?
Also, the radius of the curve is tighter on the low side of the cone, it gradually gets tightest there- this indicates the pipe is sitting slightly too high on the engine, but any lower and it will interfere with the brake rod even more
Also, the radius of the curve is tighter on the low side of the cone, it gradually gets tightest there- this indicates the pipe is sitting slightly too high on the engine, but any lower and it will interfere with the brake rod even more
Last edited by supermanotorious; 03-30-2018 at 12:58 PM.
#5
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 12,344
Received 2,189 Likes
on
1,677 Posts
It's hard to tell if the port flange springs are flush inside the flanges but all appears to be flush and straight. I only now noticed on Dennis Kirk it mentions only works with forward controls for 2006 and up so is that what you're running cvaria?
Also, the radius of the curve is tighter on the low side of the cone, it gradually gets tightest there- this indicates the pipe is sitting slightly too high on the engine, but any lower and it will interfere with the brake rod even more
Also, the radius of the curve is tighter on the low side of the cone, it gradually gets tightest there- this indicates the pipe is sitting slightly too high on the engine, but any lower and it will interfere with the brake rod even more
you don't tighten up the fasteners until everything is in place. Yes 2012
Last edited by cvaria; 03-30-2018 at 01:36 PM.
#6
It's hard to tell if the port flange springs are flush inside the flanges but all appears to be flush and straight. I only now noticed on Dennis Kirk it mentions only works with forward controls for 2006 and up so is that what you're running cvaria?
Also, the radius of the curve is tighter on the low side of the cone, it gradually gets tightest there- this indicates the pipe is sitting slightly too high on the engine, but any lower and it will interfere with the brake rod even more
Also, the radius of the curve is tighter on the low side of the cone, it gradually gets tightest there- this indicates the pipe is sitting slightly too high on the engine, but any lower and it will interfere with the brake rod even more
#7
Trending Topics
#8
The following users liked this post:
JayStronghawk (03-31-2018)
#9
I'm running the crush gaskets, I have another set I'll swap if this isnt right, but I'm all bolted and torqued up. Looks fantastic and is much quieter than my V&H short shots, gonna take the Dyna out tonight and see whats what. Here is a pic of the brake offset I configured for clearance. You probably have an opinion on it but I'm going to leave it as is and monitor it to make changes if it gets compromised.
I have an oversized nut as a spacer sandwiched by 2 nylon washers between the brake pedal and brake rod, I'm using a nylon jam nut at the end to secure it all.
I have an oversized nut as a spacer sandwiched by 2 nylon washers between the brake pedal and brake rod, I'm using a nylon jam nut at the end to secure it all.
#10
I see you've got a 99-05 frame and it sounds like you bought a 06+ pipe. Notice the difference between Cvaria's and F86's rear cylinder head pipe #2 bends (just above the timing cover).
Those forwards look more like the later model version and my pushrod isn't bent. It's dead straight and the clevis just barely clears the bracket-to-frame bolt heads.
Yeah, expect issues. Good luck.
99 forwards (I assume thru 05, but not 100% sure)
Those forwards look more like the later model version and my pushrod isn't bent. It's dead straight and the clevis just barely clears the bracket-to-frame bolt heads.
Yeah, expect issues. Good luck.
99 forwards (I assume thru 05, but not 100% sure)
Last edited by cggorman; 03-30-2018 at 11:13 PM.
The following users liked this post:
rideon (03-31-2018)