When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Dyna Glide ModelsSuper Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
I am thinking of getting a new complete front end with a 5 or 7 degree rake and my question is.... should I go with longer tubes or will it be OK with stock tubes? What about trail, Myself I don't really understand what all trail is all about or what it can cause by not having it right. Also what else needs to be done if anything to make the bike ride correctly at low and high speeds? Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
that much rake, without making other changes, will **** your ride.... I'm not an expert in this area by any means, all I can say for sure is that if you are going to go down this road, get with someone that knows what they are talking about, has done mods like this before, and has a proven track history of putting together front ends that are still rideable.
For more information, try Google'ing "rake and trail calculator"
With that much rake in the trees you will be decreasing your trail a good amount. Not dangerously, but enough to make it handle like ****.
If you were to go 5-7 degree rake you would definitely want to lengthen the tubes. More to increase the trail than for looks. By puting longer fork tubes on you would raise the frame and neck back up to change the angle of the neck rake. The thing is you would need to raise it higher than stock height to do any correction to the trail.
By decreasing trail from stock significantly, you would make the bike exremely responsive. It would make it very quick to turn when you move the bars. If you increase the trail from stock significanly, you would make the handling sluggish. It would feel like you are fighting the bars to get it to turn.
If you want to do the raked trees, I would suggest 3 degrees at most and probably go with 3-4 inch longer fork tubes. This would put it close to a stock trail.
All of this is assuming that the raked trees are using HD stock offset. That is more than I have time to explain right now though. I will try to come back later with the offset correlation.
Thanks both of you for the replys that's what I wanted to hear.... I really wanna know more about this trail thing.... The way I take it is the way I use to do with my bicycles... added another set of forks and when turning is was quick and it took a while to learn to ride it correctley? Is that what we are talking when we are talking trail?
That's exactly what they are talking about except way more critical. You are not going to ride that bicycicle 100+ MPH. I have a V Star that I lowered and raked 6 deg in the trees. I extended the forks 3" to get the trail back toa managable dimension. Before I did that, it was likeriding a crotch rocket, way too responsive for a cruiser.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.