Those with TMAX and 2:1 Exhaust - base map?
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Those with TMAX and 2:1 Exhaust - base map?
I'd put this question in the appropriate Tech forum...but want Dyna-specific feedback...
Those of you with the 96ci and running 2-1 exhausts with the Thundermax...what base map did you end up going with? I'm changing over from my 2-2's to 2-1's. Currently running map 403 (a 2-2 map). Wondering if I should just stay with 403 and let the TMAX learn with the knew pipes, or switch over to a 2-1 specific map. Thoughts?
Thanks for any input...
FYI - going with Python 2-1's...yeah, they aren't "the best" 2-1 out there according to some...but they fit the budget.
Those of you with the 96ci and running 2-1 exhausts with the Thundermax...what base map did you end up going with? I'm changing over from my 2-2's to 2-1's. Currently running map 403 (a 2-2 map). Wondering if I should just stay with 403 and let the TMAX learn with the knew pipes, or switch over to a 2-1 specific map. Thoughts?
Thanks for any input...
FYI - going with Python 2-1's...yeah, they aren't "the best" 2-1 out there according to some...but they fit the budget.
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
RE: Those with TMAX and 2:1 Exhaust - base map?
Thanks PitDog! I'll give that one a look!
Has anyone tried map 525? Looks to be a new one as of 4/2008. Looks to be pretty much the same as 391 but leaner through WOT, and the drops to lower AFRs seem to be smoothed out through some of the lower TPS and RPM ranges.
Has anyone tried map 525? Looks to be a new one as of 4/2008. Looks to be pretty much the same as 391 but leaner through WOT, and the drops to lower AFRs seem to be smoothed out through some of the lower TPS and RPM ranges.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
