Dynos for Dynas
Cruiser
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Here is my free dyno run result.
Stock 08 Street Bob with Heavy breather, Thunderheader, and SERT.
I have SE 255 cams sitting on the toolbox. Im looking for heads and maybe a big borel. I am just glad I have a before
run so I can compare. They didnt tune this one as the dyno was free. I could make some minor adjustments but will wait until my build.
Stock 08 Street Bob with Heavy breather, Thunderheader, and SERT.
I have SE 255 cams sitting on the toolbox. Im looking for heads and maybe a big borel. I am just glad I have a before
run so I can compare. They didnt tune this one as the dyno was free. I could make some minor adjustments but will wait until my build.
Last edited by Funkhousert; Apr 7, 2009 at 01:35 AM.
Road Captain
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
A lot of 95's here put my 103 to shame...103HP/111TQ...SE HTCC heads and pistons, S & S flywheels w/timken conversion, 45mm Mikuni, Crane Hi4, Zippers 577 gear drive cams, thunderheader...guessing I need some head work to catch up to you guys.
Road Master
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 782
Likes: 7
From: Texas
Dyno'ed 04-25-09 (No Tuning)
07 Super Glide
Big Radius with Standard baffles
AN Big Sucker
Stock ECM calibration and Engine
V&H Fuelpak
Blue is using FP-0597 settings (recommended settings for above listed equipment)
Very minor popping on decel
Red is using FP-1352 settings (recommended settings for Stage1 1584 Legal ECM Calibration and No Baffles)
No popping, better power, runs cooler, better mileage)
The settings between the two FP profiles were radically different, I'm surprised they are so close in regards to TQ and HP.
07 Super Glide
Big Radius with Standard baffles
AN Big Sucker
Stock ECM calibration and Engine
V&H Fuelpak
Blue is using FP-0597 settings (recommended settings for above listed equipment)
Very minor popping on decel
Red is using FP-1352 settings (recommended settings for Stage1 1584 Legal ECM Calibration and No Baffles)
No popping, better power, runs cooler, better mileage)
The settings between the two FP profiles were radically different, I'm surprised they are so close in regards to TQ and HP.
Last edited by Slipstrm; Apr 30, 2009 at 01:13 PM.
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Verdad Gallardo
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026
Verdad Gallardo
Southpaw Super Glide: A Left-Hand-Drive 1979 Harley FXE Built to Fit the Rider
Verdad Gallardo
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,638
Likes: 4,872
From: Missouri City,TX
Figured I might as well post an update regarding my tune. I went back to the same tuner for the third time...he spent another two hours with the bike on the dyno and it's MUCH better.
Still some popping on decel but not nearly as bad, and the bike pulls strong. It's not perfect, but 10x better. The third time's the charm.
74rwhp/85rwtq SAE
Still some popping on decel but not nearly as bad, and the bike pulls strong. It's not perfect, but 10x better. The third time's the charm.
74rwhp/85rwtq SAE
