06 vs 07 durability
Thread Starter
|
Cruiser
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 249
Likes: 3
From: South, Louisiana
06 vs 07 durability
I currently own a 2006 superglide with 500 miles. I am considering a 2007. I have heard a couple of opinions regarding the durability of the 07 engine. someone suggested that because the 07 has a longer stroke, that engine life might be shorter than an 06. especially with a built engine(103). Do any of you engineheads have an opinon on this? This will influence my decision on whether to go for a 2007. I don't want to move from an 06 if there is any question about the engineering of the new engine. of course I hear that the service intervals are much greater for the new engine. THAT would suggest a high degree of durability for the 07 engine. Please educate me!
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,682
Likes: 3
From: Dallas, TX
RE: 06 vs 07 durability
With the lighter parts of the '7, it may be more durable than the 06 no matter the increase in stroke. Now, you'll never turn the 96 into a high-revver, but you don't want to anyway.
Road Master
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
From: State College, PA
RE: 06 vs 07 durability
I would say the 07 would have a longer engine life because it will not have to work as hard
Actually I cannot see where it would make a bit of difference because the change is so slight.
Also I think the transmissions will last longer in the 07 and that would be more cost to repair than
replacing the top end of a motor.
WilllieC
Road Master
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
From: The FIRST state, Delaware!
RE: 06 vs 07 durability
2006 Gear Ratio (overall)
1st 9.876
2nd 6.810
3rd 5.064
4th 4.164
5th 3.477
6th 2.960
2007 Gear Ratio (overall)
1st 9.312
2nd 6.421
3rd 4.774
4th 3.926
5th 3.279
6th 2.790
1st 9.876
2nd 6.810
3rd 5.064
4th 4.164
5th 3.477
6th 2.960
2007 Gear Ratio (overall)
1st 9.312
2nd 6.421
3rd 4.774
4th 3.926
5th 3.279
6th 2.790
Trending Topics
Road Master
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
From: The FIRST state, Delaware!
RE: 06 vs 07 durability
Oh, I only know this stuff is different. I don't know if it is better or worse.. or just different.
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Verdad Gallardo
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026
Verdad Gallardo
Southpaw Super Glide: A Left-Hand-Drive 1979 Harley FXE Built to Fit the Rider
Verdad Gallardo
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,682
Likes: 3
From: Dallas, TX
RE: 06 vs 07 durability
ORIGINAL: Angry_Inch
2006 Gear Ratio (overall)
1st 9.876
2nd 6.810
3rd 5.064
4th 4.164
5th 3.477
6th 2.960
2007 Gear Ratio (overall)
1st 9.312
2nd 6.421
3rd 4.774
4th 3.926
5th 3.279
6th 2.790
2006 Gear Ratio (overall)
1st 9.876
2nd 6.810
3rd 5.064
4th 4.164
5th 3.477
6th 2.960
2007 Gear Ratio (overall)
1st 9.312
2nd 6.421
3rd 4.774
4th 3.926
5th 3.279
6th 2.790
Road Master
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
From: State College, PA
RE: 06 vs 07 durability
This is just a gut feeling I have and only my opinion or quess.
HD had the bulletin out on the early 06 Dyna trans. Then later they said to disregard it.
I still think there may have been an issue with early models that was corrected later.
Some QA test or cycling test failed in their labs would be my best guess.
Maybe a bad lot of bearings or a different qualiuty of bearing in the early models not sure.
But I spent over 20 years as a Quality Control engineer and mgr in manufacturing and it
justs makes me wonder why they would take the chance of putting out an alert that we
had to sign when we bought our bikes. This is a cover your butt measure and is not done
lightly. There had to be some issue or risk involved. We do not know what the real story
was and probably never will but for some reason HD felt the need to have the bearing
changed every 15k or so.
Time will really tell on this one when some of the 06's hit the 15k to 20k mark. Probably
all will be fine or HD would not have rescinded the bearing change notice.
But somewhere along the production line that bearing was replaced with a better one or
something like that if HD thought there was a chance of a problem.
I have faith in HD that they have done the right thing and it will be OK. I just feel better
getting an 07 because my 06 was one of the 1st ones produced and it had to have
the recall work done on the shifter deal too.
And of course the gearing ratio is somewhat changed in the 07 but that should not effect
the longevity of the transmission. Other subtile changes? possibly but I do not know for certain.
If there were I would guess it was in the quality of the components
HD had the bulletin out on the early 06 Dyna trans. Then later they said to disregard it.
I still think there may have been an issue with early models that was corrected later.
Some QA test or cycling test failed in their labs would be my best guess.
Maybe a bad lot of bearings or a different qualiuty of bearing in the early models not sure.
But I spent over 20 years as a Quality Control engineer and mgr in manufacturing and it
justs makes me wonder why they would take the chance of putting out an alert that we
had to sign when we bought our bikes. This is a cover your butt measure and is not done
lightly. There had to be some issue or risk involved. We do not know what the real story
was and probably never will but for some reason HD felt the need to have the bearing
changed every 15k or so.
Time will really tell on this one when some of the 06's hit the 15k to 20k mark. Probably
all will be fine or HD would not have rescinded the bearing change notice.
But somewhere along the production line that bearing was replaced with a better one or
something like that if HD thought there was a chance of a problem.
I have faith in HD that they have done the right thing and it will be OK. I just feel better
getting an 07 because my 06 was one of the 1st ones produced and it had to have
the recall work done on the shifter deal too.
And of course the gearing ratio is somewhat changed in the 07 but that should not effect
the longevity of the transmission. Other subtile changes? possibly but I do not know for certain.
If there were I would guess it was in the quality of the components
ORIGINAL: dxrich
Willie, what's different about the 07 transmission? different gearing? explain pls.
Willie, what's different about the 07 transmission? different gearing? explain pls.