Rinehart Racing Crossbacks - Defective Tips
Thread Starter
|
Cruiser
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
INADAZE - do you recall your before and after dyno figures??
Just curious how the HD products combine did.
At 6,000 feet above sea level my stock dyno came in at 68hp and 81ft/lbs tq.
After installation of a Stage II Arlen Ness Big Sucker intake, Rinehart Cross-back exhaust followed by a DirectLink Tune - 79hp and 91 ft/lbs tq.
Just curious how the HD products combine did.
At 6,000 feet above sea level my stock dyno came in at 68hp and 81ft/lbs tq.
After installation of a Stage II Arlen Ness Big Sucker intake, Rinehart Cross-back exhaust followed by a DirectLink Tune - 79hp and 91 ft/lbs tq.
The before and after runs didn't have a huge seperation through most of the curve, but I gained 4 hp and 10 ft/lbs tq. up until 2000, ran pretty much in line with the custom map the dealer put together until about 4500, where I lost a few hp and ft/lbs tq. The explaination on the numbers falling off at the end of the curve was because the bike was running lean and way too hot in the higher rpms and you don't spend enough time above 4500 to realize a benefit. I was told it's better for the longevity of the engine.
Max numbers were 82 hp and 100 ft/lbs tq.
Road Master
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 886
Likes: 6
You must have more done to your bike then just an air filter and pipes to be getting 100 ft/lbs of torque right? Because that is what people get after doing head and/or cylinder work on their bike along with new cams. Are you getting 100 ft/lbs on a stock motor?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vhmike73
General Harley Davidson Chat
8
Aug 13, 2010 07:38 PM
