Stage 1... Stage2... Stage 3...?
What do each of these entail and what is an average cost of each of these?
It sounds like they have to be done in order, but is a stage 2 just a stage 1 plus more?
Again, thanks for any info ya want to throw my way...
Junior
the various stages refer to what level of mods you've done to your engine.
a/c & exhaust = Stage 1
Cams = Stage 2
big bore kit (96" to 103+") or (88" to 95"+) = Stage 3
big bore kit with cams and/or headword = stage 4
Last edited by SC-Longhair; Jun 24, 2011 at 06:22 AM.
Actually It depends on what the MoCo wants to call it...LOL
From their web site....
Screamin' EagleŽ Big Bore Stage I Kit for EFI Models - 103 Cubic Inches
http://www.harley-davidson.com/gma/g...bmLocale=en_US
Screamin' EagleŽ Big Bore Stage II Kit for EFI Models - 103 Cubic Inches
http://www.harley-davidson.com/gma/g...bmLocale=en_US
Confused yet?
Actually It depends on what the MoCo wants to call it...LOL
From their web site....
Screamin' EagleŽ Big Bore Stage I Kit for EFI Models - 103 Cubic Inches
http://www.harley-davidson.com/gma/g...bmLocale=en_US
Screamin' EagleŽ Big Bore Stage II Kit for EFI Models - 103 Cubic Inches
http://www.harley-davidson.com/gma/g...bmLocale=en_US
Confused yet?
From all I've read (and I've read a lot on this), you're likely better off going aftermarket on cams and having the stock heads worked over, if you want to go beyond the Stage 1. Don't forget the tuner for the Stage 1 and above (though that's debatable to some). Though Harley offers a "Stage 1 download" for Stage 1, you still need to use some sort of tuner to go beyond that level, if you have an EFI bike. I'm not sure what HD charges for the download, but you can get into a good tuner for under $300, which will be good for future upgrades when you decide to go with different cams, head work, big bore, bigger injectors, etc.
Trending Topics
Staging Your Harley
Words: Andy Hornsby
Pics: Harley-Davidson Archive
This was originally going to be a "How do you define a Stage 1 / Stage 2 / Stage 3 / Stage 4 upgrade" question asked of anyone and everyone who might have an opinion, but the more you look into the subject you realise that in Harley terms, staging follows fairly set patterns and there isnt much room for interpretation at this level. Its not a general thing: you can stage any motor, and the numbers they go up to can get silly, but were not here to talk about that.
We are still going to be inviting specialists to add their comments on another question subject to my having the presence of mind to ask them as soon as Ive finished writing this, so theyve got chance to reply before we need their words for the next issue. That question will revolve around the recommendations they would make for a rider with a budget of "x" and a requirement of "y". But, back to the plot.
The fundamental issue with all new Harleys out of the box is that they cannot breathe efficiently, and there is a good reason for this: they have to meet all current legislation for emissions, and for noise. The expression "Harley Tax" creates the impression that it is Harleys way of squeezing another few bucks from your recently unburdened wallet, but that is very definitely not the case. Its long since been the case that UK-spec bikes are more tightly regulated than UK law demands, but that is because there is no such thing as a UK-spec Harley. As we get closer to Europe, it looks likely that well inherit their Euro 1 and Euro 2 standards which could put a different complexion on the whole thing, but thats another story. Either way, it is more cost-effective for Harley to make as small a range of alternative specifications as possible, which means that the Americans get one model, unless theyre in California, and everyone else but the Swiss get the International models. Californians and the Swiss get an even more restricted model, with catalytic converters, to meet those markets demands.
That stockers cant breathe efficiently doesnt mean they cant breathe and increasing numbers of new Harleys stay in their stock form for longer because the available power is actually enough for a lot of people, but the rewards are tantalisingly close for those who are prepared to dig their hand in their pocket for the most basic of tweaks: the Stage One.
Before we start, this isnt meant as an absolute "thou shalt fit a " because we dont work that way, and because experts will disagree with each other, and with us. There is no such thing as a definitive guide to staging, and there is no absolute right way to go, but this will hopefully put you on the right path.
There are a few myths concerning "Stage 1/4" and "Stage 1/2" but forget them because they are a poor substitute for the real thing, and while certainly cheaper than the real thing they do not provide anything like the performance increases that youre looking for. If youve not come across these cheap alternatives, they revolve around getting more air into the motor by drilling holes in the plastic air-filter backplate, and seem to work on the assumption that the restriction is getting air to the air filter, rather than getting air through the air filter into the engine.
Stage One
You can spot a Stage One bike very easily indeed: the air filter isnt sunk into the plastic moulding that fills the gap between the air filter cover and the motor. Its the tip of the iceberg, but it is the most visible part.
Stage One engines generally require no internal mechanical modifications: all you are initially doing is changing the means of getting the fuel in and the exhaust gases out, but they can include ignition mods if youre feeling flush. You can go as far as you want, but the most common basis for a Stage One is a Screamin Eagle High Flow Air Cleaner kit and a pair of slip-on mufflers.
Couldnt be much simpler, fitting an air filter, until you realise that one of the bits of emission control is that the mounting studs that hold the air filter backplate on are actually engine breathers from the cylinder head, but this explains why it is called a kit, rather than an air filter. Part of the kit is the means to change their route and then its a matter of fitting the supplied filter onto the revised cast mounting plate, allowing more air to pass, and refitting the stock cover or supplied alternative. This is possibly the first time you will have seen the crossed chequered flags in the Parts and Accessories catalogue, and the legend "For Race Applications Only". Get used to it. As soon as you remove the original backing plate, youre beyond Harleys corporate responsibility and the onus on meeting regulations is on you. No matter that you purchased the parts from an approved outlet, and that they were made by the original manufacturer of your motorcycle, you are flouting current regs and the responsibility is yours: reasonably cool at the moment, but pray that anti-tamper doesnt become law.
Having let the air flow more freely, its essential to consider the impact on the calibration of your EFI or the jetting of your carburettor. More air means proportionally less fuel, and that means a lean mixture: sort it before you run it in anger, or it could overheat and potentially seize.
Slip-on mufflers are easy enough on a new motor, while the mounting bolts are still in good nick. Slip-on mufflers do two things ... well, actually they do one, and the second is a by-product. They provide less restriction for the exhaust gases and are louder as a consequence, but a lot of people buy them just to make the bike louder.
And that could be it. For some it is enough, but it doesnt need to stop there arguably it shouldnt.
Having got the air into the carb more quickly, and eased the path of the exhaust gases, it makes sense to make sure the fuel metering system is working as efficiently as possible so you want to have a look at that and theres more to fuel systems than jetting and the recalibration of stock EFI modules.
All of a sudden it gets contentious. There are many ways in which you can sort out the original CV carb from a Dyno Jet kit to throwing it away and replacing it with a slide carb, and you will find a lot of variation in the advice youre given, but your path will typically come down to how much experience you have of tweaking carburettors, who you trust and how much money youve got. As regards to EFI, the stock unit can be recalibrated to account for the changes, on a dealers rig, but Harley themselves dont offer alternative units beyond that calibration, and your warranty will suffer if you play away.
Another useless piece of information its amazing what you pick up as you go through life, although Im struggling to find supporting evidence of it the CV, or Constant Vacuum carb was developed in the second world war for fighter aircraft. When descending rapidly, aircraft cheat gravity and this plays havoc with slide carbs as it can starve the engine of fuel. Not a problem with the fuel-injected Messerschmidts but a pain for the early Spitfires who couldnt dive as steeply without the engine cutting out or worse, the mixture getting lean for long enough for the engine to seize. The CV carb was devised to solve the problem or so the story goes.
But anyway, Harley supply different jets for their Keihin carb and, if you know what youre doing and have access to a Dyno to speed things along, its as good a starting point as anything. The factory-supported DynoJet recalibration kit is a common alternative to take a lot of the guesswork out, and can be backed up by their Thunderslide, which is a redesigned lightweight replacement slide, emulsion tube and slide needle for the CV and offers improved throttle response. Another alternative, but by no means the last one, is the Yost Power Tube: a selection of jets and the Power Tube itself, its designed to eliminate flat spots and otherwise sort out your carburation.
Or you can put it to one side or flog it on ebay and get yourself a Mikuni HSR-42, or a Screamin Eagle 44mm CV. And yes, Screamin Eagle do sell a 42mm slide carb: its made for them by Mikuni. Both carbs are for ahem, competition use, but its worth knowing that if youre going to stick the big bore CV on, youre going to need to think about a 44mm manifold to bolt it to. A street-legal 44mm CV is also available for 2001-on Twin Cams and possibly points the way to future legislation.
Injection-wise, youre stuck with the factory recalibrating modules unless youre feeling brave and want to go aftermarket. Not brave in terms of functionality, but in fighting your corner if your non-approved fuel map is deemed to be responsbile for a warranty failure, and there are a number of mechanical things that the fuel mix can affect.
Exhausts are no less involved. Slip-on mufflers are by far the easiest, but a full system will deliver more and that is a subject by itself. One thing is for certain and that is that the balance pipes will remain in place if you just fit mufflers, while aftermarket systems will often lose them. Balance pipes break up the lines of the V-twin on Sportsters and FXRs, but are generally there to reduce noise, reducing the speed of the exhaust gas by allowing it to dissipate before it exits the muffler, but there are many people who blame them for poor performance. The "hidden" low-level balance pipes on Dynas and the new Sportster mean they will stay in place for longer, as they dont detract from the appearance, but there are increasing numbers of people who are leaning towards 2-into-1 systems like Vance and Hines, Supertrapps or Thunderheaders, and they dont come much more balanced than both pots exiting the same silencer.
And thats the main stuff, but not everything because theres a few other things you can do without taking a spanner to the cases, and they are the bits that light the fuel and a good thing to do if youve gone to the trouble of fixing the carb.
As youd expect, Screamin Eagle offer a range of ignition systems, both street legal and "competition" which better match the spark to the less restricted motor, while Cranes Hi-4 and Dynas Dyna2000 remain popular choices for those less concerned by their warranties, and have an element of tunability built in so you can experiment. And if youre going to play with ignition modules, why not coils? And why not plug leads?
All of which falls within the remit of a Stage One.
Theres nothing in there that a reasonably competent home mechanic cant tackle, but if your bike is still within its warranty period, youd be best advised to talk to your dealer and make sure theyre not going to suck hard through their teeth when you bring it back, having made a mess.
What sort of mess can you make?
Too weak a fuel mix if youre playing with the carb, injection module or air filter, so keep an eye on your spark plugs afterwards and make sure theyre the right colour. Getting an air-leak in the system if you mess about with the carb or manifold, which will make it pop under load and on the overrun, and ultimately could blow the rear pot. Getting the ignition timing wrong if youve got a fully adjustable unit that will let you play beyond your expertise, in which case it will run badly. Shearing or stripping something by overtightening it, so get a torque wrench, or be cautious ... no, get a torque wrench: its potentially more dangerous for something that hasnt been tightened up enough to fall off, than it is to shear it. Rounding off a perfectly good nut or bolt by using the metric spanners from a previous bike, or your dads old imperial spanners, so get decent tools before you start.
Simple stuff really, but be aware that your dealer would rather do the job for you and charge you for the privilege but also that youve got some comeback if they mess up. Also be aware that the fitting of anything non-Harley to your warrantied bike might cause a raised eyebrow, and that even Screamin Eagle kit is no guarantee of your warranty surviving intact.
While mentioning that Stage Ones dont need to have a spanner laid on the engine, it doesnt actually mean that a Stage One cant have a spanner laid on its engine, and a Stage One 1550 is actually quite possible. Rebore the original barrels, and drop a pair of the 1550 pistons in under the stock heads and hey-presto! Youve got a Stage One 1550cc. You can leave the cams alone, although you wouldnt get the full benefit until you did look at the cams and that would be
Stage Two
Now youre motoring, but now youre more likely to need the assistance of a professional.
First thing to do is to carry out all the "Stage One" stuff that you want to do before you start, because they are the basis for the next round of modifications: theres no point sticking hot cams in a strangled motor. By the same token, theres no point getting carried away with the need for a Stage Two if youve not taken your bike to Stage One yet you might be quite happy at first base.
Stage Two is largely about cams. Youve got the means to draw fuel into the motor already, and to get the gases out. This is about how long you open the door to let the fuel through, and how wide you open it, and that is determined by what sort of work you want your bike to do.
There is probably more written on Harley Cams that anything else, and there is no shortage of people far better qualified than I to go through the absolute specifics so Im just going through the general stuff that way I cant be blamed for your sticking a wholly unsuitable cam into your motor. Whats unsuitable?
Something that makes your bike worse for the way you want to use it.
It is almost at odds with the perception of tuning that you can have a Stage Two motor that is actually detuned compared to the original but then tuning isnt only about power, its about suitability for the purpose. You could make a touring Buell, a hot rod Electra or a lazy T-Sport by judicious use of cam profiles, matched to an efficient induction/exhaust system.
There is nothing especially clever about the principle of a camshaft, and all it does is transfer a rotary motion, which the crank delivers into a pushing action, that you need to open the valves.
A perfectly round shaft spins at half the speed of the crankshaft, driven by gears in the case of Sportsters and pre Twin Cam big twins, and a chain on the stock Twin Cam. On that shaft is one "lobe" per valve and as the shaft spins, anything that follows the track round the shaft and up over the lobe will rise and fall with it. That anything is a cam follower, and it faithfully follows the track of the cams lobe, climbing the opening ramp, and pushing a pushrod up to a rocker shaft. The rocker shaft rocks when its pushed, pushing down onto the top of a valve, which is held in the closed position by heavy-duty springs. Springs move on demand, whereas the lobe on the cam is immutable, so the valve opens and stay open for as long as the lobe on the cam is holding it there, but as soon as it rotates beyond that point the spring pushes the valve closed again, rocks the rocker arm, which pushes the pushrod down quicker than gravity would force it to drop and the cam follower rolls down the closing ramp for another circuit before the opening ramp comes round again.
A couple of quick things. The cam spins at half the speed of the crank because it only needs to do something every fourth cycle in a four stroke engine. A classic 2-stroke doesnt have a camshaft spinning at the same speed as the crank because it doesnt have a camshaft at all. And cam followers are the quaint old English term for what we now refer to as lifters: almost the same logic in the naming department as lifters lift, but then they also drop. They are also sometimes called tappets, probably because badly adjusted ones make a tapping sound, I guess.
Cams are specified by lift, duration and angle and quantity: Sportsters and Buells have four with a lobe apiece, one for each valve, big twins up to and including the Evo had one with four lobes that run all four valves, and Twin Cams have two with a pair of lobes each, one per cylinder.
There is actually a fourth quotient, and that is the ramp. A steep ramp will take the pushrod to the maximum lift very quickly, and return it to rest as quickly as the spring can force it as opposed to a gentle ramp which the cam follower will well, follow.
A high lift cam will let more fuel through but they are generally used on fast spinning motors the high lift allowing a good lungful of fuel and air compensating for the need for a short duration to give the valve chance to close again and be seated correctly before the next cycle starts. You dont want to compress the fuel while the inlet port is open, because itll spit it back out again. If youre playing with high lift cams, youre more likely to use stronger valve springs to get the valve shut quickly, but there is a trade-off in that the harder the spring is pushing against the valve-train, the greater the potential for wear of the cam, follower and any bearings.
A long duration cam will give the maximum amount of opportunity for the fuel/exhaust to get in or out, but shutting the valve late increases the chance of the valve being open on the compression cycle. Better suited to slower-spinning motors in conjunction with a lower lift.
The angle will determine when the valve starts to open, and there can be an overlap built in according to what the engine is to do. It is possible to open the inlet port a little before the piston has reached TDC to make sure that it has opened sufficiently when it starts to descend, drawing fuel through; it gets away with it because the exhaust port is wide open and provides the easier route through. Similarly the exhaust valve wont quite have had time to shut before the piston descends, but by then the inlet valve will be wide open and it will draw it through there rather than the exhaust valve that is slamming closed.
You will be delighted to know that you havent got to make your own decision on any of those elements, as every combination will have been tried repeatedly by very bright engineers. The resulting profiles represent everything from radical to realistic, wild to mild, and are well known for their characteristics. Hopefully youll have a better appreciation of why the engineer who knows about these things is asking you lots of questions and if theyre not, be concerned: they may be good, but theyre not psychic and they need to know what you want.
If you want to play a greater part, you might want to consider the technology of the follower/lifter/tappet. Back in the old days of British pushrod twins, the cam followers were little more than hardened steel metal blocks that slid on the hardened camshaft lobes on a thin film of clean oil; they had a means at the top to locate a pushrod, and a means of adjustment. Meanwhile, Harley have used roller bearings to track the lobes for generations, and housed them at the bottom of their lifters. Not just ordinary lifters either, theyve used hydraulic lifters since the end of the Knuckleheads: high technology at the heart of the big twin, but the fashion for decades was to replace them with solids. But times have changed.
Hydraulic lifters are self-adjusting, using clean engine oil to fill a chamber within the lifter body and a piston that provide the base for the pushrod. The size of the chamber is determined by the valve train itself, and the slack built into it. With the chamber full of oil, the lifter takes up the available slack and acts as a single unit of exactly the right size. But so does a screw thread, I hear you cry. Ah, true, but heres the rub. An engine is made of metal and gets hot, and metal expands when it gets hot. So as you run your motor the hot bits expand and the cylinder head actually moves further way from the camshaft. How far can a motor grow? Not far but enough to make a difference. Try .040" on an Evo motor, when your valve clearances should be somewhere nearer to .002. With hydraulic lifters, as the engine gets hotter, and the gaps increase, more oil fills the bigger chamber and the slack is taken up.
Its the opposite of your recollections, if your recollections are of old Brits, because the expansion of the pushrod is greater than the barrels, so Brit bikes rattle when theyre cold, and Harleys rattle when theyre hot or they do if theyve got solid lifters.
There is a downside, there always is. Hydraulic tappets are much more complex, and susceptible to dirty oil, and fall down as an engineering principle when the lifter becomes worn and oil can escape from the chamber because it screws up the adjustment.
For all their sophistication, mechanically adept luddites and power junkies missed the simplicity and economy of "solids" and they converted back, backed up by experience of failed units in days when engineering tolerances werent as fine as today, but for the majority of owners a set of hydraulic lifters were always better than a badly adjusted set of manual tappets.
Today there are a massive number of engineering companies offering a vast array of hydraulics, semi-hydraulic and solid lifters for your Twin Cam, Evo, Shovel or Panhead. It will come as no surprise either to note that you can also get high performance lifter blocks to house them, and these are not to be confused with cosmetic covers: if youre going to seek the finest engineering tolerances in your lifters, youre advised to make sure theyre sliding in a block engineered to the same standards.
While youre in the motor playing with cams, its as well to replace the stock cam bearing with a better one, but aside from that and the original Stage One mods youre about there. You might want to consider a different ignition module but you should perhaps have accounted for that when you did the Stage One, giving yourself some elbow-room for further development.
Youll note from Harleys Parts and Accessories catalogue that 1550cc motors rear their heads quickly when talking about Stage Two, but thats not a pre-requisite. Yes, a 1550cc big-bore would be nice, a 1700cc stroker would be nicer but that isnt necessarily a Stage Two. It could be, but if youre going to those lengths, its worth contemplating a little porting and checking of the rest of the lump, which takes us to
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
Stage Three
There are those who would say that the first thing you should do to make a Harley work properly is to sort out the heads, but that is generally where "Stage Three" comes in.
The combustion chamber on Harley V-twins has benefited from better gas flow characteristics with every evolution, but the standard porting is not best suited to high performance. Porting is a subject in itself, and will be dealt with in the near future by someone who knows what hes talking about, but we have reached the point where youre really not going to sit in a shed with a bastard file and an heirloom toolkit. If youve got a fully equipped workshop and we are talking fully equipped here, with lathes, milling machines and a space heater youll know much more than I do already, and Im amazed youre still here.
This is where the engineers come in, and you have to put yourself in their hands. Sure, you can buy heads etc and stick them on yourself, but when youre that deep in, youre not going to put those heads in without seriously considering what you want from the bike. Well, if youve got any sense youre not.
Youre in big money country now and a half-cocked Stage Three will be not much better than an amateur Stage Two certainly not worth the additional expense of the parts. Yes, I know you can get ported heads off the shelf, but ported for what? More torque or more horsepower? Higher or lower revs? Fuel efficiency or straight line ability? Before you start you need to know where the power is needed, and what sort of power, to determine the size and shape of the valves: until then its merely a technical exercise.
And its not just heads, and that is why we now start to differentiate between engineers and fitters. A Stage Three motor really should be a blueprinted engine. Its no longer enough that it is as good as an assembly line can make it, if youre going to do it properly, its got to be as accurate as the original drawings: the blueprints. If the drawing has a dimension of 1.7701mm thats what it has got to be, not +/- .005mm.
Production lines dont do that, fitters cant do that, mechanics would love the time to learn that. The only people who can do that properly are engineers and even then, only the better engineers. The bad news is that there arent many left because there are few coming up through the ranks, and thats because production lines have rendered a lot of basic skills obsolete and machine minders fill their steel-toecapped boots in industry.
A blueprinted engine will be less stressed than a production line example even a good production line example because everything will work as it should: as it was designed to do. The sort of engineer who will be capable of matching the specification will be more than capable of sorting out your porting, cam and carb requirements to make it better than the blueprint for your specific application, and that is the ultimate state of tune for your bike. Harley-Davidson produce motorcycles for the masses, an engineer will make a motorcycle for you assuming you know what you want, and can communicate that to your chosen professional.
Stage Four
Anything goes. Turbos, blowers, nitrous, strokers, billet motors, massive motors built for the purpose from parts that have never seen Auntie Janets bar and shield logo.
Quite bizarrely, a Stage Three bike would be the better bike in the vast majority of cases, and when compared to some of the bikes that drop into the Stage Four category, is likely to be quicker for longer in road use because theres no guarantee that itll be hand assembled to the same standard as a Stage Three.
That said, you could always get a Stage Four engine and get it blueprinted it to make it better still unless youre 100% certain of the ability of the original builder and youd be foolish not to entrust to an engineer who you did trust implicitly.
It doesnt get any more sensible when you consider that it is perfectly possible to bolt an off-the-shelf turbocharger to a stock motor, in which case its a Stage Four instantly. Stock cams and stock carb (on at least one option) with just the turbos plenum and convoluted plumbing to drive the compressor replacing the air-filter and exhaust. The only thing it has in common with the more serious hardware is the power output, which can be twice that of the stock motor: torque and horsepower. Oh yes, and cost. Stage Four doesnt come cheap.
A turbo can work out at Ł3,500, and an engine can cost twice that before you open it up and fettle it some more and it would be a strange horsepower junkie who could leave the cylinder head in place once theyd unpacked the motor or the barrels.
And its worth a quick look at the crank while were down that far.
And itd be silly not to weigh the pistons seeing as theyre out.
And is that a slight lip on the inlet tract ? Pass me the emery
Stage Four is the domain of the serious power addicts. Doubling the stock horsepower isnt a challenge any more, trebling it would be good though. You wont see many of these bikes on the road because theyll have sacrificed a lot of their rideability along the way in fact some will be physically unrideable but on a quarter mile strip of tarmac, head-to-head with someone who thinks they know better, they will demonstrate just how much you can get out of an air-cooled v-twin motorcycle.
The sad truth, though, is that yesterdays Stage Four will be thrashed by tomorrows Stage Two, and the day afters Stage One. Performance is transient, even in Harley circles.
Theres something you need to know: no matter what youve got itll never be enough.
There is some irony in that a lot of people are discovering Harleys today after years of buying faster and faster sportsbikes in search of the thrill they remember when they first started the sheer number of stock bikes out there today.riding only to discover that riding was more about freedom than speed, which maybe explains




