Tires Again
I am looking at purchasing a new set of tires for my 2012 Harley FXDC.
I am looking the Scorcher 31 (stock on bike) and the Commander II.
Could you provide a break down of the differences in these tires?
This was their answer:
The Commander II is designed more for highway cruising. It has a more rigid casing to provide better handling and stability under weight such as two-up riding. The Commander II is available at most Michelin motorcycle tire dealers.
The Scorcher 31 has a more supple casing and profile designed to provide rock-solid performance handling. The Scorcher 31 is available through HD dealers only.
We appreciate your business and thank you for choosing Michelin.
I am having trouble deciding, I have the Scorchers now and have 7300 miles on them Bought last July. I might get another 2,000 out of them, I am taking a 3,000 mile trip in July so I want fresh tires. I am not that agressive of a rider, I do like twisties but I rarely scrape anything (maybe scraped peg and muffler three times ever).
Is anyone using the Commander II on a FXDC? I would like to know your thoughts.
Thank you.
them very far before putting my bike away for the winter. I DO think they
gripped better than the Dun-flops, but any new tire always feels good so
I dunno..
I do scrape pegs and pipes often enough that I like predictable handling so
we'll see as the new season arrives..
I've had Michelin pilot roads before on other bikes and liked the balance of grip and longevity. The commanders have the same 2ct tech in them.
Ive been happy with the scorchers despite weird vibes from the front at times and the rear getting a bit skatey in the wet but hey its a heavy bike with a fair amount of torque to challenge traction.
My daily ride is a mix of mountains, highway, freeway then city traffic.
If I get 15-20,000 out of the commanders ill be happy.



