When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I dig the sound and the snorting of an S&S carb. Nothing like it. The smell of gasoline, the sucking of air, the enrichener lever and the tear drop itself. Its a piece of modern muscle bike art. Overkill? Sure... but who cares. Your riding an EVO! Woohoo!
I dig the sound and the snorting of an S&S carb. Nothing like it. The smell of gasoline, the sucking of air, the enrichener lever and the tear drop itself. Its a piece of modern muscle bike art. Overkill? Sure... but who cares. Your riding an EVO! Woohoo!
Actually, there's nothing like the sound of a Quadrajet when you open the secondaries! I love that moan. lol
Since this appears to be an opinion thread, here's my 2 cents:
I've had no problem with the stock CV carb in almost 23 years of owning my FLHS. The 'secret' is to have the dang thing tuned correctly for the engine it's attached to. I'm a big fan of dyno tuning, but that's not to say a good 'seat of the pants' tune isn't satisfactory. I get a solid 40 mpg commuting on my 80" EVO, and that's with a combination stop & go street and interstate riding. Interstate only, I get mid 40's, as long as I'm not trying to be the fastest 65 year old fat dude on a Harley...
I have had S&S on my last two bikes, including the current one. On this bike I started out with the butterfly carb and it sucked, both literally and figuratively. I went with a CV and was never happy with it. I ordered the S&S kit and all my troubles went away. I love the enricher being right on the air cleaner. The choke on the CV when it replaces the butterfly is weird to route, at least it was on my old bike. It all felt jury rigged. The S&S fits like it belongs there. I like the K&N filter on the S&S better than anything else. You clean it, re-oil it on the rare occasion and ride. Superior design for a DIY type of guy. Dialing in the S&S is simple. As long as you don't have any intake leak issues you'll get it dialed in quickly, especially on a 1340 stock configuration with aftermarket exhaust. The instructions are clear as a bell.
I have had S&S on my last two bikes, including the current one. On this bike I started out with the butterfly carb and it sucked, both literally and figuratively. I went with a CV and was never happy with it. I ordered the S&S kit and all my troubles went away. I love the enricher being right on the air cleaner. The choke on the CV when it replaces the butterfly is weird to route, at least it was on my old bike. It all felt jury rigged. The S&S fits like it belongs there. I like the K&N filter on the S&S better than anything else. You clean it, re-oil it on the rare occasion and ride. Superior design for a DIY type of guy. Dialing in the S&S is simple. As long as you don't have any intake leak issues you'll get it dialed in quickly, especially on a 1340 stock configuration with aftermarket exhaust. The instructions are clear as a bell.
I've been doing some engineering trying to figure out what my over-the-winter engine work on the FXR is going to entail, and I'm wondering about carbs.
For ordinary builds (mine is going to be stock stroke and hopefully stock bore assuming my jugs are ok, mild comp bump, probably stock pistons), what advantage is there to going S&S?
I'm really hoping there is a good answer because I think the teardrop air cleaner is totally badass and I'd love a reason to go that way, but I'm having a hard time finding a reason that my plain old CV won't work just fine or better.
So argue with me.
I had an S&S on my Evo and it was a great carb. The bike didn't get great mileage, 35, but it was built up with a bigger cam and compression bump.
But... if I had a stock carb that was working fine, I would not spend the money on a new carb.
I had a S&S air cleaner that I sold on eBay recently for cheap. Too bad we're a few months late Omaha I would have been glad to see you get a good deal. Check eBay surely they are out there.
I am odd. I have had all three and liked all 3. Decided to go this route on my 97 softail and it has been one of my greatest mods on the bike. Two things about it I like the most is zero coughing ever. Unless I just took off without letting her warm up. And even that is very rare. And I average about 45-48 MPG which I would have never expected. Truth is all 3 are great carbs provided the installer/rider knows what they are doing with them.
I know 'feel' is a different thing, but how do the dyno sheets stack up on the differences, and at what level of performance do they make a difference rather than just at the gas pump ( ... don't mention Dynojets).
I've seen a few and the ultimate performance difference was very slight on modestly tuned bikes.
I know 'feel' is a different thing, but how do the dyno sheets stack up on the differences, and at what level of performance do they make a difference rather than just at the gas pump ( ... don't mention Dynojets).
I've seen a few and the ultimate performance difference was very slight on modestly tuned bikes.
Have to be careful using dyno sheets to compare carbs. Dyno runs are WOT - but most of your riding with a bike is part throttle, and how a carb performs on a cold/hot start, part throttle cruise, mild acceleration, etc. cannot be determined from a WOT dyno sheet.
All that said, I would say that a properly functioning and tuned carb, any carb, is going to work pretty much just as well as the next one. They all do the same thing, slightly different ways of accomplishing them, and none of them are that precise of an instrument (compared to a modern feedback sequential fuel injection system). My Evo had a S&S working fine, but I wouldn't buy a different one unless mine for some reason broke beyond repair. There's not much of a difference to warrant spending the money on something else.
The key is properly functioning and tuned for the bike it's on.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.