Front pulley
And for all the people who say "change them regardless if it's pre- '95" (and with all due respect, which I do have for most on here) the nut was still tight with less than .001 wear on the main gear splines, best I could measure. Yeah, call me lucky.... and a smart azz at times

And yeah, I'm changing the rear pulley too.
Good luck!
-Dave
And OP t1508vej, I missed the part of your initial post about the rear pulley Good idea..
Last edited by 98hotrodfatboy; May 15, 2020 at 04:19 PM.
The pulley rotates during normal operation.
In other words RIPSAW is saying OP isn't riding his bike enough.
Trending Topics
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
either way, I totally agree!Occasionally someone will say "nice day for a ride" and I always reply - "some are better than others, but everyday is a good day to ride"

Not possible to ride too much, for me anyway

--------------------------
I don't know when they changed from the original 3 lock screw hole to the 2 hole and a plate arrangement, but seems that's when the problems with front pulleys stripping out started. They corrected that with the 40250-94 pulley. It's wider in the splines. Where the one drm photographed has a raised hub and teeth, the new gears are solid / flat across the back. That with the thicker, but narrower spacer adds about 1/4 inch of splines to engage the main drive gear and eliminates "wobble" according to Dan89
Original pulley
Mine ('87) was the older version that had 3 holes for a single hex head screw as a lock. It was tight first time I took it off to build the trans and was still tight this time and splines look good as the new gear. I've thought for years the pulley problems of the early '90s were more of a material quality problem than a design flaw. Who knows?
I did tidy up a few more things just in the nick of time, it would seem.
Original rear sprocket
Brake pads - about 65k miles. Still running original front pads, but they'll get swapped when I put new tire on (soon)
















