mpg conversion is this right?
I do notice the enrichener has a bit of sponginess to it in the closed position,like with it closed I can push it another 1/8 of an inch.
I have an Andrews EV27 cam and a Killer carb, when the weather improves I'll do the calculation as well and post the results. Been riding the bike since Saturday ( just got it from the shop ) and I've been having so much fun I didn't even think about it. lol
Yes, my motor is stock. Other than breather & pipes, it's all stock.
15% to 20% seems to be a bit much from a cam change. Regardless, for some reason you're burning about 27% more fuel than me. I would expect that from a 124" S&S, but it seems a bit much for your bike.
I ordered one of Dale's carbs a week ago. Hopefully I won't see a drastic drop in MPG. All other threads I've read that mentioned MPG after his carb install have been good.
Well now that the conversion part is figured out ( thankyou Internet) I need some help increasing gas millage. I emailed Dale the builder of the Killer Carbs and he said "As far as gas mileage goes I have hundreds of customers we flh's and the stock motors with a good exhaust and air cleaner are getting 48 mpg on the road but as soon as you put in a cam the mileage will drop by 15 to 20 percent depending on the cam.
I ordered one of Dale's carbs a week ago. Hopefully I won't see a drastic drop in MPG. All other threads I've read that mentioned MPG after his carb install have been good.
I'm going to check for intake leak and also give some thought to the enrichener, would that enrichener needing the extra push to close be a culprit?
You are correct on the killer carbs , I've heard nothing but increases in mpg but hard to find flht's with the upgrades.
You are correct on the killer carbs , I've heard nothing but increases in mpg but hard to find flht's with the upgrades.
Yes, increasing pilot jet size will make the bike run richer and lower your fuel economy. Each additional jet size will be noticeable and two or three jet sizes could be better than five mpg.
Yes, if the enrichener is not in all the way, you're adding more fuel to the mix. (Unlike an automobile, the enrichener is not a choke which "chokes" off air, it is actually an enrichener which will add fuel to the fuel mixture.) This would be very similar to running a bigger pilot jet.
Yes, if the enrichener is not in all the way, you're adding more fuel to the mix. (Unlike an automobile, the enrichener is not a choke which "chokes" off air, it is actually an enrichener which will add fuel to the fuel mixture.) This would be very similar to running a bigger pilot jet.
Thanks YJ that gives me a place to begin after I check the intake for leaks.
By the way do you really live on the breezie island of Aruba?
By the way do you really live on the breezie island of Aruba?
Last edited by RidemyEVO; May 7, 2012 at 09:37 PM.
Yes, increasing pilot jet size will make the bike run richer and lower your fuel economy. Each additional jet size will be noticeable and two or three jet sizes could be better than five mpg.
Yes, if the enrichener is not in all the way, you're adding more fuel to the mix. (Unlike an automobile, the enrichener is not a choke which "chokes" off air, it is actually an enrichener which will add fuel to the fuel mixture.) This would be very similar to running a bigger pilot jet.
Yes, if the enrichener is not in all the way, you're adding more fuel to the mix. (Unlike an automobile, the enrichener is not a choke which "chokes" off air, it is actually an enrichener which will add fuel to the fuel mixture.) This would be very similar to running a bigger pilot jet.
On the dyno test sheet on another of my posts, incomparison to the latest dyno sheet I have ( will post soon ) shows that dispite Dales heavy jetting the carb can easily be leaned out or enriched using the mixture screw.




