General cam question
steve
Like I said above, if a guy wants to spend another $400.00 for geared cams, then great, but don't mislead the public and blow the old cam tensioner problems into something they aren't.. Yeah, there was a problem right up to the 03' MY, but they have been addressed.
The new bikes come with polished chains and a different material for the tensioner. I guess after 25,000 miles, it wouldn't be a bad idea to check them, but they certainly aren't a " ticking time bomb waiting to explode, destroy your motor, and cost you alot of grief."
But there are no gear cams available for the '06 yet. So for now, I'll use SE chain driven.
Is a gear drive better than chain drive? Strictly from a mechanical point of view, Of Course It Is!! Fewer moving parts, less wear and tear, etc, etc, etc. But, it's all in the execution. There were a lot of problems with the early chain drives. And I think they have been addressed and resolved reasonably well. Unless you run high spring pressures, I think they will be fine. If I even had a hint that this was a, "Ticking time bomb", I wouldn't buy the bike. Every so often I'll open it up and take a look. Besides, there's no other choice at the moment. So it's a dead issue.
I spoke with a local engine builder today. Here's what I learned about the stock '06 Dyna heads:
1. Max valve lift is .550.
2. Off the shelf flow rates are very good. A simple 30 minute clean up and a 5 angle valve job and they flow "better than most SE heads". Very encouraging. Also, the now stock beehive springs are excellent - as I suspected.
So the decision has been made, partly by default. SE 204 chain drive cam, mild port and polish job, SE 95" cylinders, high compression cast piston, SERT, slip ons, SE air cleaner. Effective cylinder pressures here at 6,500' asl will be about 168; the same pressure as a stock engine at sea level. Should run well all day long with mid grade pump gas in pretty much any condition I might encounter.
Thanx for all your help. It's nice to pass these ideas around and get varying viewpoints.
But there are no gear cams available for the '06 yet. So for now, I'll use SE chain driven.
Is a gear drive better than chain drive? Strictly from a mechanical point of view, Of Course It Is!! Fewer moving parts, less wear and tear, etc, etc, etc. But, it's all in the execution. There were a lot of problems with the early chain drives. And I think they have been addressed and resolved reasonably well. Unless you run high spring pressures, I think they will be fine. If I even had a hint that this was a, "Ticking time bomb", I wouldn't buy the bike. Every so often I'll open it up and take a look. Besides, there's no other choice at the moment. So it's a dead issue.
I spoke with a local engine builder today. Here's what I learned about the stock '06 Dyna heads:
1. Max valve lift is .550.
2. Off the shelf flow rates are very good. A simple 30 minute clean up and a 5 angle valve job and they flow "better than most SE heads". Very encouraging. Also, the now stock beehive springs are excellent - as I suspected.
So the decision has been made, partly by default. SE 204 chain drive cam, mild port and polish job, SE 95" cylinders, high compression cast piston, SERT, slip ons, SE air cleaner. Effective cylinder pressures here at 6,500' asl will be about 168; the same pressure as a stock engine at sea level. Should run well all day long with mid grade pump gas in pretty much any condition I might encounter.
Thanx for all your help. It's nice to pass these ideas around and get varying viewpoints.
I think you'll really like that combo! Keep us posted when you get it all set up!
GC



