When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have 251 cams as well. I am starting the build this week.
The 58 TB I have is the non touring one. No cruise compatablility and Manifold is a seperate unit.
TB is fine, the 260's were most likely too "big" the 251's should make either bike quick as hell. Cam choice has much more positive/negative effect on ridability than TB/Carb size, hell so does the exhaust for that matter, unless one is chasing a dyno sheet instead of a fun to ride machine!
I have 251 cams as well. I am starting the build this week.
The 58 TB I have is the non touring one. No cruise compatablility and Manifold is a seperate unit.
Telling you, swap it out or return it if its possible for something significantly smaller. Its just too darn big. I have a 114" build I just started on out of boredom with a 6200 redline. Im still sticking with a twin 50mm bore with custom welded and ported 1.625" intake runners.
That SE 58 uses 1.8" runners. Thats almost 46mm, thats just too darn big, you gain nothing with it. Im sure it will "work" fine, but your in all honesty just leaving some low band power on the table. But anyway, regardless of what you do, good luck with the build. =D
TB is fine, the 260's were most likely too "big" the 251's should make either bike quick as hell. Cam choice has much more positive/negative effect on ridability than TB/Carb size, hell so does the exhaust for that matter, unless one is chasing a dyno sheet instead of a fun to ride machine!
That depends. When you reduce port velocity, your reducing intake inertia charge. That translates to less air in the chamber at lower rpms, that softens up your bottom end. It can have an effect similiar to a cam thats "too big"(which is actually a poor definition). Mentioning dyno sheet chasing in the same sentance but you also think tossing on an oversized TB is OK. You contradict your self heavily here and maybe you dont even realize it.
You are right about the cam def of too "big" being incorrect, but I think you get what skyhook and I were both trying to say, and as for 58mm TB being oversized I still disagree with you but hey thats what makes the world go around, trying different things and seeing how they work for yourself. I would have not have thought of trying the 58 but it was recommended to me(not by a HD dealer) and I will say that I did not try the stock 50mm tb on the motor first with all the other parts,it all went together at once, so you could have a point that the 50 maybe better than some bigger TB's , I can only say what I have tried is working very well in my case, it is very fun to ride, that is what we are all after!
You are right about the cam def of too "big" being incorrect, but I think you get what skyhook and I were both trying to say, and as for 58mm TB being oversized I still disagree with you but hey thats what makes the world go around, trying different things and seeing how they work for yourself. I would have not have thought of trying the 58 but it was recommended to me(not by a HD dealer) and I will say that I did not try the stock 50mm tb on the motor first with all the other parts,it all went together at once, so you could have a point that the 50 maybe better than some bigger TB's , I can only say what I have tried is working very well in my case, it is very fun to ride, that is what we are all after!
I agree with some of your points, dont get me wrong. But just to quickly clarify. Not being 100% familiar with the newer 50mm TB that comes stock, I honestly cant say what it lacks. Im sure it may be a bit too constrictive in some ways. Im sure there is room for improvement. And like I said earlier, Im sure the 58 WORKS OK with your setup. I just know from experience, that you can still IMPROVE your build's low end power and throttle response with a smaller TB. Whether or not you want to, is obviously up to you, its your ride.
I'm watching. Probably will save my money.
Think I'll wait till the stock market gets better anyway. Killing me.
Then maybe 52-54mm something.
I do know about the port volicity stuff.
I also know this little dink Harley 46mm, even with a good improver to it, just don't cut it. Why this disscussion.
Like that old Holly carb, with enough accelerator pumps (2-50cc reo)and big shooters you can make a pig fly. But it was a little more focused.
By the way the heads on this bike are prepared pretty well.
All Woods springs and valves ported and breathed on just about to the max by Wolfgang Grasser in Baytown, Tx. Inlets are bigger than 1.66 but I cannot remember just what maybe 1.78, something like that. They flo 280 cu.ft. at whatever pressure you guys use. Standard flow bench. They are set up for the Woods 400 Tw8 series cams.
Course Bob woods being Bob Woods figured TW8-6 cams at least. May have been right. And shorting up the gearing. Gotta be careful what you ask for with him. So the heads are better that what I'm running. I was hesitant last year, doing better now, but broker.
Wolf is building a engine for a guy I know in Houston, heads flow just about 300cu.ft. Will be on a Ultra. So I guess standard work for him.
Now Wolfgang knows a thing or two about this. He has won the Horsepower shootout at Datona several times. Pretty focused efforts for sure. It's on Woods web site. I'm bragging for him, he won't. But these heads are capable of doing well.
At that time he also worked on the TB and the best got was 240. Stock was 200, (220?) So it's still the choke. I figure a good number would be 300 but I don't have the numbers different TB's flow. Feeding two cylinders after all. I doubt a SE 50cc would do that stock, but I don't know. I figure whatever I get I'm just bolting on. Cost enough as it is.
You guys are great keep it up. I would like to go to Sturrgis, may have time and I'd ride all the way.
Last edited by Old Gunny; Dec 21, 2008 at 08:32 PM.
Harley came around this area with a demonstration ride van a few (6)weeks ago. I road 5 of the new ones including a SE Fatboy and a SE Ultra. I noticed they both reved free and were nice and snappy, the Ultra surprised me actually, very light feeling.
They come with 50mm or bigger TB's???
This is actually what got me interested in bigger TB. Serves me right.
Harley-Davidson Fat Boy Becomes a Dark, Decepticon-Inspired Custom
Slideshow: Killer Custom's latest build relies on styling changes rather than performance upgrades, giving the cruiser an entirely different personality.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.