Am I wasting $ ?
The big bore alone won't do it. The powerplant is a system. Going from 88" to 95" by itself is not going to work. You need to look at a mild street P&P since the heads are coming off anyway. Then, head combustion chamber volume will dictate what piston to use (dome, flat top, etc) and what head gasket thickness to use to achieve about 10.0:1 static compression ratio. Then, you can pick a cam based on lift and the key parameter - intake valve closing to give you the corrected compression ration you are looking for. Most guys stick to 9.2:1 or less to run on pump gas, with a cranking compression of 190-195 psi. Play around with the big boyz calculator. Then, you are going to need all of the supporting bits and pieces - adjustable pushrods, lifters, camplate, inner primary bearings, etc. You may also be looking at high flow injectors than the stock 3.91 g/sec. You are also going to want to look at a tuner, like SERT or Thunder Max.
However, before you get too far into this - measure your crank run-out because you may be looking at serious bottom end $.
What is your target HP/Torque?
Last edited by harley_jeff; Feb 16, 2012 at 11:32 AM.
Increasing displacement from 88" to 95" will increase TQ/HP about 8%. So let's just say, for talking purposes, that your current Stage I configuration is making 80TQ/70HP. An 8% increase in displacement should result in an equal increase in TQ/HP, so going to 95" bumps you up to 86TQ/76HP for about $300, if you are turning the wrenches; that's about $50 a foot pound. Plus, you have the opportunity to mill the heads while they are off; no port work, just a boost in compression. This would cost about $75 and should be worth another 3-4 foot pounds of torque which brings the unit cost down to about $38 per foot pound. You have optimized what you have.
Look at another scenario, something along the lines of you current approach. You retain the 88" displacement and spend, what, $1000 on cams, pushrods, lifters and cam plate upgrade and, if you are lucky, you achieve the same increase in performance. Which is questionable because compression is still pretty anemic and not anywhere near what those cams need to be "happy"; you have not optimized what you have. So, let's say you get lucky and hit 90TQ/80HP as above. Great but you have now paid $100 per foot pound. So, if on a budget and approaching in phases, increasing displacement first appears to be the most cost effective solution.
I have left out the cost of labor, tuner/tune, compensator and clutch under the assumption that those costs would be common to either approach.
So, if cost is not an issue, you should definitley go "all in". You would be looking at about $1600 to bore/hone cylinders, new SE cast flat top pistons, cam plate upgrade, cams, inner cam bearings, lifters, pushrods, a "street port" job, gaskets and oil and an easy 100TQ/90HP. So, the unit price now is about $80 per foot pound. Again, keeping things simple and leaving out those costs that would be common to either of the above approaches.
I know the numbers may be off a bit; the above numbers are not based on buying parts "OTC" from a dealership. But the concept remains the same and I think you will get the point; go all in. JMHO.
Last edited by djl; Feb 16, 2012 at 02:57 PM.
Then again, there is no substitute for displacement and while you're that far into it a mild big bore wouldn't be a whole lot more money, but would yield considerable performance.
I am just going through that now myself, and just today ended up taking mine to 107" for a relatively small increase in cost.
Good luck - you'll enjoy the boost either way!
Roger
Trending Topics
IMHO, there is only one way to go if a complete engine swap is your plan; 120R is the best deal going.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
I helped a friend with the same build except no head porting, competition valve job, new guide seals, stock valves and springs, everything else per the above and that engine made 103TQ/96HP; that was a year ago and he is still as happy as a clam.
Last edited by djl; Feb 18, 2012 at 03:00 PM.









