How much does compression affect power and other ?'s
I was thinking of doing BB kit/heads and wondering how compression affects horsepower. I'm trying to determine what the ideal compression is that will run on pump gas and not destroy my starter.
Also is the horsepower gained by raising compression and adding the required compression releases worth the expense? Meaning, if I can get 100HP with 9.5:1 that starts easily without releases how much power would be expected if I raised the compression to 10.2:1 and go through the trouble of the releases? Is it safer to keep it on the low side to avoid tuning issues and detonation issues?
I'm certain there's more to it so any explanations to help me understand is truly appreciated.
Thanks,
J.
Last edited by cruzmisl; Apr 5, 2012 at 09:36 PM.
I was thinking of doing BB kit/heads and wondering how compression affects horsepower. I'm trying to determine what the ideal compression is that will run on pump gas and not destroy my starter.
Also is the horsepower gained by raising compression and adding the required compression releases worth the expense? Meaning, if I can get 100HP with 9.5:1 that starts easily without releases how much power would be expected if I raised the compression to 10.2:1 and go through the trouble of the releases? Is it safer to keep it on the low side to avoid tuning issues and detonation issues?
I'm certain there's more to it so any explanations to help me understand is truly appreciated.
Thanks,
J.
The proper compression, for the cam/cubic inch, being used, can make, or break the build.
10.2 cr with, say a Wood 9B, will be a stone turd, and on the other hand, 10.2 cr with and Andrews 26, will spark knock(detonation) so loud, it rip the ring lands off the piston.
Scott
I was thinking of doing BB kit/heads and wondering how compression affects horsepower. I'm trying to determine what the ideal compression is that will run on pump gas and not destroy my starter.
Also is the horsepower gained by raising compression and adding the required compression releases worth the expense? Meaning, if I can get 100HP with 9.5:1 that starts easily without releases how much power would be expected if I raised the compression to 10.2:1 and go through the trouble of the releases? Is it safer to keep it on the low side to avoid tuning issues and detonation issues?
I'm certain there's more to it so any explanations to help me understand is truly appreciated.
Thanks,
J.
There may be some debate about what is considered reasonable corrected and cranking compression for a street build but there does seem to be a consensus that 9.3 corrected and 190psi cranking are reasonable and manageable targets. Personally, I would install compression releases anytime cranking compression exceeds 185psi. They may not be needed but they will definitely extend battery and starter life.
If your '08 is stock, i.e., stock heads and head gasket and deck height is typical for the later models, your static compression should be a tad above 9:1; chamber volume does vary so it could be a little more or less. The CR 575 intake closesa at 35* ABDC which would put your corrected CR about 8.6 and cranking CR about 174psi. That's pretty mild and not getting full benefit of the cam's capability to make power; you have room to grow.
Heads will have to come off so have some head work done while they are off.
I guess that's the point of my question. If lowering the compression to say 10:1 makes the bikes less susceptible to detonation and is easier to tune but will only cost a few HP that makes more sense to me. On road trips you can't always guarantee high quality gas.
Trending Topics
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders








