need help!! cams
I was going to put the 204's in the bike.I love the idle and have read that with a good tune 100+ ft. lbs. of torque and low 90's hp which is fine.I was then told i need to go with a cam with more lift due to the better flowing heads.
The suggested cams were the Woods 222's,555's and the t-man torquester 555 cams.
Will any of these cams at idle sound similar to the 204's and will these cams produce more torque and hp than the 204's?I really only want to do this once..
I do like torque and not so concearned with hp..
Please help me choose the right cam..
Thanks in advance
Peace and Prayers
To answer your question though, of the cams listed, the Woods 222 is the only one with the same intake close as the SE204; the other two really need more than stock compression to perform well.
If warranty is an issue, go with the 204s; you could always install a set of 1.7 rockers to increase lift. If warranty is not an issue, go with the 222s. JMHO.
I was going to put the 204's in the bike.I love the idle and have read that with a good tune 100+ ft. lbs. of torque and low 90's hp which is fine.I was then told i need to go with a cam with more lift due to the better flowing heads.
The suggested cams were the Woods 222's,555's and the t-man torquester 555 cams.
Will any of these cams at idle sound similar to the 204's and will these cams produce more torque and hp than the 204's?I really only want to do this once..
I do like torque and not so concearned with hp..
Please help me choose the right cam..
Thanks in advance
Peace and Prayers
The 222's would be our choice here.
Scott










