When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have no need for the expense of 100+ octane to get rid of the ethanol. At the rate I use fuel (about a tank a week) there is literally no impact on the bike. the fuel doesnt sit in it long enough to collect a meaningful amount of water (not that our humidity here is high enough for it to collect any....)
OP. Could please explain how a slow burning high octane gas can out perform 87 octane which burns more complete?
You do know that octane is simply a measure of the fuels burn rate and not a power rating. All gasoline is 115,000 btu's. BTU's is power. So the slower the burn rate the less power developed during the power stroke. And the more unburned gas goes out the exhaust pipe.
But that info is beyond some of the folks on here pay grade.
I have had 30 H-D's since 2006 from 883, 1200, 1250 cc's and 88 through 120 Cu In motors and have put 400K on them combined all with E10 87 octane and they run strong.
My 120's are 10.5:1, the 1250 is 12:1 as is the Street Rod and the 110's range from 9.5:1 to 10.12:1.
Here is some thing for those "pure" folks. The E10 gas is the same cost to produce as straight gas yet because of marketing "pure" bs the sheep flock in and pay about $0.30 to much for it.
Motogp specs alcohol for its Sunoco race fuel because it acts as a refrigerant cooling the incoming charge to be denser to assist more power during the power stroke. So much for the "pure" BS.
But that does go out the window at 15% and higher mixtures.
OP. Could please explain how a slow burning high octane gas can out perform 87 octane which burns more complete?
You do know that octane is simply a measure of the fuels burn rate and not a power rating. All gasoline is 115,000 btu's. BTU's is power. So the slower the burn rate the less power developed during the power stroke. And the more unburned gas goes out the exhaust pipe.
This is not true. Octane is a measure of a fuel's resistance to knock. It has very little to nothing to do with actual burn rate and higher octane does NOT burn incompletely in lower compression engines, it simply is not necessary in them.
Originally Posted by lh4x4
But that info is beyond some of the folks on here pay grade.
Not sure what pay grade has to do with anything here....
Originally Posted by lh4x4
I have had 30 H-D's since 2006 from 883, 1200, 1250 cc's and 88 through 120 Cu In motors and have put 400K on them combined all with E10 87 octane and they run strong.
My 120's are 10.5:1, the 1250 is 12:1 as is the Street Rod and the 110's range from 9.5:1 to 10.12:1.
.............
Originally Posted by lh4x4
Here is some thing for those "pure" folks. The E10 gas is the same cost to produce as straight gas yet because of marketing "pure" bs the sheep flock in and pay about $0.30 to much for it.
Again, not true. Ethanol is much more expensive to produce, gallon for gallon, than gasoline. In fact, it costs almost $4 to produce a gallon of ethanol. If ethanol wasn't heavily subsidized, the cost of blending it in gasoline would not be cost effective (like it is in the first place, figuring in the hidden costs such as croplands lost to fuel production versus food production, etc).
Originally Posted by lh4x4
Motogp specs alcohol for its Sunoco race fuel because it acts as a refrigerant cooling the incoming charge to be denser to assist more power during the power stroke. So much for the "pure" BS.
Again, the "cooling effect" is more than offset due to the loss in energy content due to methanol's lower btu index.
Seems like we've been through this before..........
will my bike perform better if i use octane 94 gas instead of 91
NO!NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO and btw, uh NO! the higher octane will drain your wallet.....if the bike doesn't perform with the recommended octane something is wrong,tune,plugs,wires,.......it is not the fuel. unless you got a tanful of shitty fuel...but the octane is not your issue.
octane has everything to do with the burn rate...high compression motors require a fuel to burn at the top of the piston cycle// 87 fuel ignites well before the piston reaches top of the cycle....(dieseling) igniting from compression before the spark. compression equals heat heat equals ignition .....get a grip people. higher octanes have a lesser combustion rate hence the reason it is recommended for all high performance motor., btw if the motor has a shitload of wear...nothing will matter; the motor will run just fine with any fuel.
Last edited by ChickinOnaChain; Jun 4, 2017 at 08:49 AM.
octane has everything to do with the burn rate...high compression motors require a fuel to burn at the top of the piston cycle// 87 fuel ignites well before the piston reaches top of the cycle....
I'm not sure where you are getting your information, but it is wrong.
The octane rating is a measure of the products ability to resist premature ignition due to compression, period.
It has nothing, absolutely nothing to due with:
burn rate
kindling temperature of the fuel (the spark is more than hot enough to lite all commercial gasoline quickly)
And, as other have suggested, octane rating has nothing to do with:
power per gallon (BTU)
temperature of the burn
Detergent levels in the product (some brands may load 91, but it is not done universally or even predominantly.)
Originally Posted by rocket23
btw if the motor has a shitload of wear...nothing will matter; the motor will run just fine with any fuel.
Hmmm... We should all be using worn out engines and running them on salt water.
Last edited by hairymoth; Jun 4, 2017 at 06:12 AM.
I run all octane's in my Ultra from reg to prem. Your engine will let you know what it will run on, really do you know what you are actually getting? I ride mine, it's for transportation, doesn't get polished and waxed before every ride. I don't dress up in a Harley outfit. Sorry got off topic. It's just gas !!
You may run fine on regular if you don't run up hills or get on your bike. It will sound fine but that don't mean you're not damaging your engine; carbon build up etc. For the few bucks you save a week on gas, wait until you have to tear your engine down. They recommend premium for a reason, they don't just sit and throw darts at a board with octane numbers on them. Another mistake is running ethanol free gas. If you are running regular without ethanol you're really building up the carbon. Ethanol burns hotter than gas and burns off carbon. That's why cars 50 years ago had to be de-carboned and modern ones do not. There is no reason to run non-ethanol gas in any modern engine, except for boats (which sit on the water and the ethanol will absorb water). You're riding a bike that was made by folks that have built bikes for 100 years. They aren't trying to screw you. Don't turn riding a bike into a ****ing science project. You'll be the one on the board next month with a thread: "Harley's are crap! I just sucked a piston with only 10 k miles!"
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.