Xr1200
http://www.dropbears.com/m/models/ha...s/xr750ttb.jpg



They sold the XR they had, so I didn't manage to get my grimey mits on one. The 1125R and the 1125CR were pretty nifty machines though.
http://www.einszweidrei.de/
Never ever trust dry weights. It seems Triumph get their dry weights by simply weighing the bike without fuel. Buell seem to have gone the "japanese" route of weighing the bike without any fluids at all, motor oil, coolant, fork oil, battery water, nothing.
I would give the cornering score a 4+ on your scale. I've ridden sportbikes in years past (fzr600, cbr900rr) and they were a 5. The xr doesn't turn in as quick as a pure cafe bike, but rather requires a sort of finesse---that's the fun part! Having said that, I believe a veteran rider on an xr could hang with the hooligans in the twisties. All attributes considered, I'm having more fun on this thing than the rockets. Best bike I've ever owned---end of hunt!
I don't the 2002 has a completely redesigned motor, the two 2001-2002 really only share frame and suspension and thus a there is a signifigant wieght difference
This one is the same bike as mine
http://motoprofi.com/motospecspictur...iple-1999.html
Seat Height 800 mm (31.5 inches)
Wheelbase 1440 mm (56.69 inches)
Curb Weight 223 kg (492 lb)
Weight Distribution (front - rear) 46.6% - 53.4%
Fuel Capacity 18 litres (4.76 gallons)
Figuring optimistically that you are talking 40lbs with all fluids tops the 1125 enjoys a pretty good wieght advantage. Need to find an XR1200 to try out now, I imagine that my gripe would be the same as the XB12 Lightning...Great handling, great brakes, weak power for the genre and I've yet to ever feel a decent sportster tranny.
That lump is what keeps a lot of more sport oreinented types off bikes like the Lightning and the XR.
Last edited by Tripped1; Feb 2, 2009 at 03:58 AM. Reason: I R smert
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders







