When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have been riding in Cali for 10 years...riding longer just only 10 in Cali. Anyway I wear a novelty and have never been pulled over for a helmut. I know of only one time it happening and it was at Hollister a couple years back when my buddy's son got pulled over and didn't have his endorcement. When my buddy picked the bike up the cop made him go get a real helmut as he had a novelty at the time.
I also never had any blinkers, baffles or mirrors on my custom builds and had sideways plates to boot and never got pulled over for it as an infraction. I also rode for 7 years in Cali without my endorcement and wasn't bothered about it either...
I've heard that what ever happens in Cali spreads to the rest of the country but I haven't seen any kind of push for mandatory laws here.
I think if you guys get together, (in a serious way), you all can defeat this B/S.
It sounds un-constitutional to me.
Our representatives don't care about the Constitution out here..
Didn't CO pass an under 18 mandatory helmet law last year?
Not exactly sure when, but yes, we have that law.
I don't think it's a bad thing for the kids tho. I just don't like the bike drivers being forced to wear them.
Our representatives don't care about the Constitution out here..
And this is a surprise to anyone? This is the peoples republic of chinafornia...I say give it back to mexico and I'll find someplace else to live...oh wait, they already gave it back to mexico...well at least a little at a time...
Here is a good site http://www.boltofca.com/ to see how things are going with respect to the helmet law. Funny how they find the "no list no law" to be the sole reasoning behind why it should be a fix it citation as opposed to simply writing that citation based on the "reasonable person" ruling which pretty much expects people to have a bit of common sense. No list No law came into play in the original case People of the State of California v. Melody Robin Woods, which occurred around a 1992 citation written by CHP Officer Victor Vasquez under CVC section 27803b. This section provides for the rider of a motorcycle to wear a helmet that meets or exceeds section 27802. CHP bulletin #34, which was offered as evidence in the case explained how helmets of the type worn by Woods did not meet DOT standards. Woods testified that she was on a limited budget and after shopping at numerous motorcycle shops found a helmet that had a DOT sticker affixed and purchased said helmet for $35.00. In other words, the court found that Woods had made a reasonable attemp to comply with the law and since the law was found to be vague no list no law came into being.
The state of Tennessee has determined that a helmet must have a certain thickness of padding and clearifies things to the point they can and do write citations based of the helmet not meeting their requirements. I would expect california to amend the CVC to make things much clearer and I seriously doubt they will repeal their helmet law. Rather, it will simply be amended as necessary.
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
7 Times Harley-Davidson Chucked Tradition Out the Window
Verdad Gallardo
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Verdad Gallardo
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
I would expect california to amend the CVC to make things much clearer and I seriously doubt they will repeal their helmet law. Rather, it will simply be amended as necessary.
CA wrote the helmet about 20 years ago. We don't need no stinkin' new laws from big brother protecting us from ourselves and we do not need any 20 year old laws ammended for that cause either.
Let those who ride decide. I have a "novelty", DOT half (pictured below), and a FF helmet and wear which ever I choose depending on the ride and conditions. Heck, when I cross state lines into AZ/UT, I will ride with no helmet when I feel like it.
It is nice to see that we may be able to at least ride with our novelty helmets, if we "choose" to wear them, and not be worried about getting hassled by law enforcement.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.