ABATE Motorcycle Crash Fatality Study
Wow" That just reinforces what I've thought of ABATE since
they first started up.
They are complete DUMB AZZ's that have no clue what they
are talking about when it comes to motorcyce safety at all.
I wear a helmet 99% of the time in my 40+ years of riding, but
back when this fight over helmet laws first started I went to
rallies at parliament grounds when they were meeting on helmet
laws to fight against them. I went to them wearing my helmet!
WHY???
Because if you let them tell you,you have to wear a helmet they
will start telling you, you have to wear seat belts and before long
they will tell you everything you can and can not do in your life..
All of what we were fighting against is coming to be true now
because we let them get away with it..
That is the only reason to fight helmet laws, not because some
total DUMB AZZ says it is safer to not wear them. IMO anyone
who thinks it is safer to ride a motorcycle without a helmet
needs to never be allowed to breed because we have way to
many stupid people in this world already and we sure don't
need anymore then there are now!
Sorry for the rant, but stupidity just makes my blood boil!!
OK" I'm done now! (I think?)
From http://www.abateflorida.com/html/body_join.html:
I was wearing a helmet because it's mandatory on military installations. That didn't stop the medical personnel from advising me to give up riding altogether, though.
I'd like to see helmet laws changed to:
1) No helmet required for those 18 and over.
2) No public funds for those suffering head injuries from accidents when they were not wearing a DOT-approved helmet.
I believe that we should have the right to shoose - but those that choose poorly should not become burdens to society as a direct result of their choice. I feel the same about seatbelts, tobacco, fast food, and alcohol.
Wow" That just reinforces what I've thought of ABATE since
they first started up.
They are complete DUMB AZZ's that have no clue what they
are talking about when it comes to motorcyce safety at all.
I wear a helmet 99% of the time in my 40+ years of riding, but
back when this fight over helmet laws first started I went to
rallies at parliament grounds when they were meeting on helmet
laws to fight against them. I went to them wearing my helmet!
WHY???
Because if you let them tell you,you have to wear a helmet they
will start telling you, you have to wear seat belts and before long
they will tell you everything you can and can not do in your life..
All of what we were fighting against is coming to be true now
because we let them get away with it..
That is the only reason to fight helmet laws, not because some
total DUMB AZZ says it is safer to not wear them. IMO anyone
who thinks it is safer to ride a motorcycle without a helmet
needs to never be allowed to breed because we have way to
many stupid people in this world already and we sure don't
need anymore then there are now!
Sorry for the rant, but stupidity just makes my blood boil!!
OK" I'm done now! (I think?)
From http://www.abateflorida.com/html/body_join.html:
You and I must have been at different meets and both read something
different into this above post because I distinctly see this as saying to
ride a motorcycle without a helmet is safer.
(ABATE QUOTE)
In the Florida heat and humidity, fatigue is minimized for the rider without a helmet allowing them to ride more alertly. The infringement on the senses, caused by most helmets, could also be less for the non-helmeted rider. It is also possible the helmeted rider perceives their helmet as a cloak of protection, consequently causing the rider to drop their defensive riding alertness.
To me these people have lost total sight of why not to have helmet laws!!
Maybe just me but thats what I hear out of ABATE"
They mean nothing to me.
After inspecting the damage to my helmet in my '82 accident, and the lack of head injury I incurred, I knew then that I would always be wearing one.
I do though support your right to choose for yourself.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
And what about those poor folks that get run over by a cager while not wearing a helmet? Are we to tell them that they have to take care of themselves when they have a severely reduced earing capacity AFTER they are injured due to some else's negligance? That's the same as saying that because you were standing drunk near the street, or walking to a cab that you have to take care of yourself at your own expense when someone else violated the law and hit you when they ran off the road.
Bravo! I couldn't have said it better...


