When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The MoCo tells you to use the kill switch because they want you to have both hands on the bars when you shut the engine off. They don't want to get sued because someone lost control of his or her bike while trying to shut the engine off. If that doesn't "compel" you to use the kill switch, then it doesn't. So what?
Not looking to argue.....
As others have said, it sounds like the lawyers trying to make it idiot-proof. It is a CYA in case they get sued, "I was just trying to turn my bike off and when I let go of the clutch the biked lurched forward and ran over my cat!" "Well you were not following the proper sequence as spelled out in the manual....."
As I posted previously - which no one has addressed - an old timer told me if you rev the throttle as you hit the kill switch it might cause the engine idle set point in the computer to be reset to a higher level.
That seems a little far fetched IMO (and yeah, I know, no one gives a ratsass). I will use the ignition switch with my right hand....and will leave the bike in 1st gear too.
So here is a semi-related question. I have a 1926 Dodge Brothers Coupe and a mechanic told me to always start with the trans in neutral because the clutch pressure plate still puts a load on the engine when starting. So the question is, does starting my bike in first gear with the clutched engaged put more of a load on the started than starting it in neutral?
As others have said, it sounds like the lawyers trying to make it idiot-proof. It is a CYA in case they get sued, "I was just trying to turn my bike off and when I let go of the clutch the biked lurched forward and ran over my cat!" "Well you were not following the proper sequence as spelled out in the manual....."
As I posted previously - which no one has addressed - an old timer told me if you rev the throttle as you hit the kill switch it might cause the engine idle set point in the computer to be reset to a higher level.
That seems a little far fetched IMO (and yeah, I know, no one gives a ratsass). I will use the ignition switch with my right hand....and will leave the bike in 1st gear too.
So here is a semi-related question. I have a 1926 Dodge Brothers Coupe and a mechanic told me to always start with the trans in neutral because the clutch pressure plate still puts a load on the engine when starting. So the question is, does starting my bike in first gear with the clutched engaged put more of a load on the started than starting it in neutral?
A "wet" clutch is never totally disengaged, so there will be drag (load) when the the engine is started with the bike in gear w/clutch lever pulled in. IN MY OPINION, there's less of a load on the starter when the bike is started in neutral with the clutch engaged. I can't tell you about your '26 Dodge.
As others have said, it sounds like the lawyers trying to make it idiot-proof. It is a CYA in case they get sued, "I was just trying to turn my bike off and when I let go of the clutch the biked lurched forward and ran over my cat!" "Well you were not following the proper sequence as spelled out in the manual....."
As I posted previously - which no one has addressed - an old timer told me if you rev the throttle as you hit the kill switch it might cause the engine idle set point in the computer to be reset to a higher level.
That seems a little far fetched IMO (and yeah, I know, no one gives a ratsass). I will use the ignition switch with my right hand....and will leave the bike in 1st gear too.
So here is a semi-related question. I have a 1926 Dodge Brothers Coupe and a mechanic told me to always start with the trans in neutral because the clutch pressure plate still puts a load on the engine when starting. So the question is, does starting my bike in first gear with the clutched engaged put more of a load on the started than starting it in neutral?
A "wet" clutch is never totally disengaged, so there will be drag (load) when the the engine is started with the bike in gear w/clutch lever pulled in. IN MY OPINION, there's less of a load on the starter when the bike is started in neutral with the clutch engaged. I can't tell you about your '26 Dodge.
In the mid 1960s, motorcycle injuries and fatalities were at "epidemic" levels. Those little Japanese bikes were so cute and so cool that it seemed like everybody wanted one or wanted to ride one. Way too many people who had not a clue about how to ride a motorcycle, tried and failed. It was then that the feds mandated several "safety modifications" for motorcycles, including kill switches. I was about thirteen then and I remember the carnage.
A "wet" clutch is never totally disengaged, so there will be drag (load) when the the engine is started with the bike in gear w/clutch lever pulled in. IN MY OPINION, there's less of a load on the starter when the bike is started in neutral with the clutch engaged. I can't tell you about your '26 Dodge.
Except for a cold start, I've been starting the bike in 1st gear on all kinds of different brand bikes (including many Harleys) for over 30 years. Never had a starter/starting problem on any of them. I also never use the kill switch.
Obviously we were all taught or learned differently. Back when I first started riding kill switches had not been invented yet so for me they still do not exist. My take on the matter is just another electrical devise to one day fail and leave you stranded.
There are a few systems that fire up on our modern bikes, some are off the main sw and some are off the kill sw. I choose to fire them up and shut them down separately, rather than all at once. Why? hell if I know.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.