When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Been considering for a couple years now about trading and getting a touring bike. Test road 16 RGS and 16 SGS last year. Pluses and minuses on both. I liked SGS faring design better but counter steering very slow response vs RGS because of fairing weight on forks. Decided to wait at least until this year. Lo and behold the M8 arrives. I did not consider RK because of seat height. Now RKS comes out and boasts seat height 2" lower. Dont like the $3k price increase on RKS especially with no shield. 2016 models have nice deals on them to get rid of them. M8 worth it over HO 103? What are options on lowering RK seat height and back a little? Is it as simple as buying a different seat or is suspension modification required or both? Many more questions in my head about the 4 bikes I mentioned but I am trying to keep this simple for now. Any thoughts?
Last edited by kanelakos; Mar 7, 2017 at 05:14 AM.
Been considering for a couple years now about trading and getting a touring bike. Test road 16 RGS and 16 SGS last year. Pluses and minuses on both. I liked SGS faring design better but counter steering very slow response vs RGS because of fairing weight on forks. Decided to wait at least until this year. Lo and behold the M8 arrives. I did not consider RK because of seat height. Now RKS comes out and boasts seat height 2" lower. Dont like the $3k price increase on RKS especially with no shield. 2016 models have nice deals on them to get rid of them. M8 worth it over HO 103? What are options on lowering RK seat height and back a little? Is it as simple as buying a different seat or is suspension modification required or both? Many more questions in my head about the 4 bikes I mentioned but I am trying to keep this simple for now. Any thoughts?
M8 worth it over HO 103? much better engine and suspension
What are options on lowering RK seat height and back a little? Is it as simple as buying a different seat or is suspension modification required or both?
different seat maybe, but lower profile may be firmer which wouldn't be good for Touring and same thoughts for lowering the suspension, 3" vs 2" travel not best for Touring..I hate the thought of buying a new bike and having to throw that much $$ at it to modify for ergonomics and comfort..bars, seat, suspension, etc.
but need to know more about your riding habits...1 up or 2 up, majority long distances or shorter, you ride aggressive or laid back, do you want a infotainment, sounds like not a requirement for you based on your comments and what's your budget ceiling (for now..lol)
I just went from 20 plus years on WideGlides which I love and kept my current on to a 17 RGU. 4 weeks and 2500 miles in and all I can say is why did I not do this years ago.
I picked the RG over SG for a couple of reasons, one being the look I prefer the shark nose over the batwing. The most important reason is that I am a tall guy and the Shark made me feel less confined, felt like I had more room up front which may all be in my head but I immediately felt more comfortable on the RG than the SG when I started looking. The other big reason was that the frame mounted fairing on the RG seemed to be more nimble for me at slow speed maneuvers. The handling was more of what I was used to from none faring bikes
Others here that have more seat time on HO 103s can give you a better comparison as my seat time on that engine amounted to test rides. I will say that I really liked the M8 on the first ride and have only grown to enjoy it more with each mile. THe power delivery seems more linear to me than the TCs with the same pull throughout the range.
As to seat height I can't help you as I am 6'7" and have the opposite issues but my suggestion would be to attempt to get the seat height lowered by going with a lower seat first rather than suspension mods. There are a lot of aftermarket and HD seats that can lower you and it would be worth a try to get the dealership to let you demo some seats on the different bikes to see if you can accomplish what you want.
Lastly there are deals on 16s as you say but there are also dealers making deals on 17s. I paid $900 below list for my 17 RGU out the door after all taxes, fees etc... had been added in.
The 2017 RK is a bargain by comparison. I am a Road King rider and been there and done that with batwings and Heritages. The seat height can be addressed with seats, tire size or suspension mods that are cheper the $3000. The RK special has a place, but it's not a value. The M8/RK is. If I was in the market for a $22K+ Harley I would buy the RK.
Think carefully about what you want out of a touring bike. Saving a few buck buying a RK often ends up with riders spending a lot of money trying to finish it.
Nothing wrong with a 2016. The M8 is better. Better is not always necessary .
I can only give you my experience and justification for going M8 RG...
I was really drawn to a left over 16 RGU CVO - pretty much at dealer invoice. But... after riding the M8, I knew I would always regret spending that much money on older technology. The suspension and the M8 put the newer bikes in a whole new category. Nothing wrong with the '16's and older, but M8's really are that much better.
So I went with a RGU, which had most of the upgrades I would have done to a Special. I added a stage II, some bolt-on pretties, a new seat, and I am good to go. I am so glad I went with the M8. And as Scudda said, I am all but positive that the M8 will make it's way down to the at least the soft tails in '18.
I can only give you my experience and justification for going M8 RG...
I was really drawn to a left over 16 RGU CVO - pretty much at dealer invoice. But... after riding the M8, I knew I would always regret spending that much money on older technology. The suspension and the M8 put the newer bikes in a whole new category. Nothing wrong with the '16's and older, but M8's really are that much better.
So I went with a RGU, which had most of the upgrades I would have done to a Special. I added a stage II, some bolt-on pretties, a new seat, and I am good to go. I am so glad I went with the M8. And as Scudda said, I am all but positive that the M8 will make it's way down to the at least the soft tails in '18.
Best of luck with your decision.
This is exactly the situation I was in. Very happy I went with the 17.
Harley-Davidson Fat Boy Becomes a Dark, Decepticon-Inspired Custom
Slideshow: Killer Custom's latest build relies on styling changes rather than performance upgrades, giving the cruiser an entirely different personality.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.